IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0107412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Great Spotted Cuckoo Fledglings Often Receive Feedings from Other Magpie Adults than Their Foster Parents: Which Magpies Accept to Feed Foreign Cuckoo Fledglings?

Author

Listed:
  • Manuel Soler
  • Tomás Pérez-Contreras
  • Juan Diego Ibáñez-Álamo
  • Gianluca Roncalli
  • Elena Macías-Sánchez
  • Liesbeth de Neve

Abstract

Natural selection penalizes individuals that provide costly parental care to non-relatives. However, feedings to brood-parasitic fledglings by individuals other than their foster parents, although anecdotic, have been commonly observed, also in the great spotted cuckoo (Clamator glandarius) – magpie (Pica pica) system, but this behaviour has never been studied in depth. In a first experiment, we here show that great spotted cuckoo fledglings that were translocated to a distant territory managed to survive. This implies that obtaining food from foreign magpies is a frequent and efficient strategy used by great spotted cuckoo fledglings. A second experiment, in which we presented a stuffed-cuckoo fledgling in magpie territories, showed that adult magpies caring for magpie fledglings responded aggressively in most of the trials and never tried to feed the stuffed cuckoo, whereas magpies that were caring for cuckoo fledglings reacted rarely with aggressive behavior and were sometimes disposed to feed the stuffed cuckoo. In a third experiment we observed feedings to post-fledgling cuckoos by marked adult magpies belonging to four different possibilities with respect to breeding status (i.e. composition of the brood: only cuckoos, only magpies, mixed, or failed breeding attempt). All non-parental feeding events to cuckoos were provided by magpies that were caring only for cuckoo fledglings. These results strongly support the conclusion that cuckoo fledglings that abandon their foster parents get fed by other adult magpies that are currently caring for other cuckoo fledglings. These findings are crucial to understand the co-evolutionary arms race between brood parasites and their hosts because they show that the presence of the host's own nestlings for comparison is likely a key clue to favour the evolution of fledgling discrimination and provide new insights on several relevant points such as learning mechanisms and multiparasitism.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuel Soler & Tomás Pérez-Contreras & Juan Diego Ibáñez-Álamo & Gianluca Roncalli & Elena Macías-Sánchez & Liesbeth de Neve, 2014. "Great Spotted Cuckoo Fledglings Often Receive Feedings from Other Magpie Adults than Their Foster Parents: Which Magpies Accept to Feed Foreign Cuckoo Fledglings?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-10, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0107412
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0107412
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0107412&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0107412?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard J.S. Ward & Sheena C. Cotter & Rebecca M. Kilner, 2009. "Current brood size and residual reproductive value predict offspring desertion in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(6), pages 1274-1281.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giuseppe Boncoraglio & Rebecca M Kilner, 2012. "Female Burying Beetles Benefit from Male Desertion: Sexual Conflict and Counter-Adaptation over Parental Investment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-4, February.
    2. Ashlee N Smith & Mark C Belk & J Curtis Creighton, 2014. "Residency Time as an Indicator of Reproductive Restraint in Male Burying Beetles," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-6, October.
    3. Hilary Cope & Edward R Ivimey-Cook & Jacob Moorad, 2022. "Triparental ageing in a laboratory population of an insect with maternal care [Male age alone predicts paternity success under sperm competition when effects of age and past mating effort are exper," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(6), pages 1123-1132.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0107412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.