IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0107321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness and Glaucoma. The Beijing Eye Study 2011

Author

Listed:
  • Ya Xing Wang
  • Liang Xu
  • Lei Shao
  • Ya Qin Zhang
  • Hua Yang
  • Jin Da Wang
  • Jost B Jonas
  • Wen Bin Wei

Abstract

Purpose: To examine subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) in eyes with glaucoma, using enhanced depth imaging spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Methods: The population-based Beijing Eye Study 2011 included 3468 individuals with a mean age of 64.6±9.8 years (range: 50–93 years). A detailed ophthalmic examination was performed including spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) with enhanced depth imaging for measurement of SFCT, and assessment of fundus photographs for presence of glaucoma. In addition, the group of patients with chronic angle-closure glaucoma (ACG) from the Beijing Eye Study (n = 37) was merged with a group of patients with chronic ACG from the Tongren hospital (n = 52). Results: Assessments of SFCT and glaucoma were available for 3232 (93.2%) subjects. After adjusting for age, axial length, gender, anterior chamber and lens thickness, SFCT was not significantly associated with presence of glaucoma (P = 0.08; regression coefficient B:−15.7). As a corollary, in logistic regression analysis with adjustment for age, axial length and intraocular pressure, presence of glaucoma was not significantly associated with SFCT (P = 0.20). If only open-angle glaucoma was considered, multivariate analysis revealed no significant association between SFCT and presence of open-angle glaucoma (P = 0.44). As a corollary, in logistic regression analysis, open-angle glaucoma was not significantly associated with SFCT (P = 0.91). In a similar manner if only ACG was taken into account, SFCT was not significantly associated with the presence of ACG (P = 0.27) in multivariate analysis. As a corollary in binary regression analysis, presence of ACG was not significantly associated with SFCT (P = 0.27). Conclusions: In multivariate analysis with adjustment for age, axial length, gender, anterior chamber and lens thickness, neither OAG nor ACG was associated with an abnormal SFCT.

Suggested Citation

  • Ya Xing Wang & Liang Xu & Lei Shao & Ya Qin Zhang & Hua Yang & Jin Da Wang & Jost B Jonas & Wen Bin Wei, 2014. "Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness and Glaucoma. The Beijing Eye Study 2011," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-7, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0107321
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0107321
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0107321&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0107321?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dan Zhu & Yan Wang & Yan Fei Zheng & Da Yong Yang & Kai Guo & Xian Rong Yang & Xin Xia Jing & Ian Y Wong & Qi Sheng You & Yong Tao & Jost B Jonas, 2017. "Choroidal thickness in school children: The Gobi Desert Children Eye Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0107321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.