IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0105722.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Funding Infectious Disease Research: A Systematic Analysis of UK Research Investments by Funders 1997–2010

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph R Fitchett
  • Michael G Head
  • Mary K Cooke
  • Fatima B Wurie
  • Rifat Atun

Abstract

Background: Research investments are essential to address the burden of disease, however allocation of limited resources is poorly documented. We systematically reviewed the investments awarded by funding organisations to UK institutions and their global partners for infectious disease research. Methodology/Principal Findings: Public and philanthropic investments for the period 1997 to 2010 were included. We categorised studies by infectious disease, cross-cutting theme, and by research and development value chain, reflecting the type of science. We identified 6165 funded studies, with a total research investment of UK £2.6 billion. Public organisations provided £1.4 billion (54.0%) of investments compared with £1.1 billion (42.4%) by philanthropic organisations. Global health studies represented an investment of £928 million (35.7%). The Wellcome Trust was the leading investor with £688 million (26.5%), closely followed by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) with £673 million (25.9%). Funding over time was volatile, ranging from ∼£40 million to ∼£160 million per year for philanthropic organisations and ∼£30 million to ∼£230 million for public funders. Conclusions/Significance: Infectious disease research funding requires global coordination and strategic long-term vision. Our analysis demonstrates the diversity and inconsistent patterns in investment, with volatility in annual funding amounts and limited investment for product development and clinical trials.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph R Fitchett & Michael G Head & Mary K Cooke & Fatima B Wurie & Rifat Atun, 2014. "Funding Infectious Disease Research: A Systematic Analysis of UK Research Investments by Funders 1997–2010," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-13, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0105722
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105722
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105722&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0105722?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Itamar Katz & Ryuichi Komatsu & Daniel Low-Beer & Rifat Atun, 2011. "Scaling Up Towards International Targets for AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria: Contribution of Global Fund-Supported Programs in 2011–2015," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(2), pages 1-7, February.
    2. Leslie A Gillum & Christopher Gouveia & E Ray Dorsey & Mark Pletcher & Colin D Mathers & Charles E McCulloch & S Claiborne Johnston, 2011. "NIH Disease Funding Levels and Burden of Disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(2), pages 1-9, February.
    3. John-Arne Røttingen & Claudia Chamas, 2012. "A New Deal for Global Health R&D? The Recommendations of the Consultative Expert Working Group on Research and Development (CEWG)," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-2, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ciarli, Tommaso & Ràfols, Ismael, 2019. "The relation between research priorities and societal demands: The case of rice," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 949-967.
    2. Eduardo Martínez-Martínez & María Luisa Zaragoza & Elmer Solano & Brenda Figueroa & Patricia Zúñiga & Juan P Laclette, 2012. "Health Research Funding in Mexico: The Need for a Long-Term Agenda," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Joseph Millum, 2023. "Should health research funding be proportional to the burden of disease?," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 22(1), pages 76-99, February.
    4. Kaushik Ghosh & Irina Bondarenko & Kassandra L Messer & Susan T Stewart & Trivellore Raghunathan & Allison B Rosen & David M Cutler, 2020. "Attributing medical spending to conditions: A comparison of methods," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Zhang, Lin & ZHAO, Wenjing & Liu, Jianhua & Sivertsen, Gunnar & HUANG, Ying, 2020. "Do national funding organizations properly address the diseases with the highest burden? - Observations from China and the UK," SocArXiv ckpf8, Center for Open Science.
    6. Luba Katz & Rebecca V Fink & Samuel R Bozeman & Barbara J McNeil, 2014. "Using Health Care Utilization and Publication Patterns to Characterize the Research Portfolio and to Plan Future Research Investments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Shibayama, Sotaro & Baba, Yasunori, 2015. "Impact-oriented science policies and scientific publication practices: The case of life sciences in Japan," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 936-950.
    8. Zhang, Lin & ZHAO, Wenjing & Liu, Jianhua & Sivertsen, Gunnar & HUANG, Ying, 2020. "Do national funding organizations properly address the diseases with the highest burden? - Observations from China and the UK," SocArXiv ckpf8_v1, Center for Open Science.
    9. Madsen, Emil Bargmann & Andersen, Jens Peter, 2024. "Funding priorities and health outcomes in Danish medical research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    10. Lin Zhang & Wenjing Zhao & Jianhua Liu & Gunnar Sivertsen & Ying Huang, 2020. "Do national funding organizations properly address the diseases with the highest burden?: Observations from China and the UK," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 1733-1761, November.
    11. Colin F Boyle & Carol Levin & Arian Hatefi & Solange Madriz & Nicole Santos, 2015. "Achieving a “Grand Convergence” in Global Health: Modeling the Technical Inputs, Costs, and Impacts from 2016 to 2030," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    12. Vanderelst, Dieter & Speybroeck, Niko, 2013. "Scientometrics reveals funding priorities in medical research policy," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 240-247.
    13. Laura M McNamee & Fred D Ledley, 2017. "Modeling timelines for translational science in cancer; the impact of technological maturation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    14. Ohid Yaqub & Javier A Luna & Duncan Aq Moore & Alfredo Yegros-Yegros, 2022. "Responding to a disease with resources from other diseases: Evidence from Zika vaccine research dynamics [Protective Efficacy of Multiple Vaccine Platforms against Zika Virus Challenge in Rhesus Mo," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(6), pages 942-950.
    15. Irwin Feller, 2022. "Assessing the societal impact of publicly funded research," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 632-650, June.
    16. (Corresponding author) Gavin Yamey & Kaci Kennedy McDade & Wenhui Mao & Ekene Osakwe, 2022. "Financing Research And Development For New Vaccines In Developing Asia-Pacific Countries," Asia-Pacific Sustainable Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 29(2), pages 125-153, November.
    17. Pierre Azoulay & Joshua S Graff Zivin & Danielle Li & Bhaven N Sampat, 2019. "Public R&D Investments and Private-sector Patenting: Evidence from NIH Funding Rules," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 86(1), pages 117-152.
    18. Gelin Xu & Zhizhong Zhang & Qiushi Lv & Yun Li & Ruidong Ye & Yunyun Xiong & Yongjun Jiang & Xinfeng Liu, 2014. "NSFC Health Research Funding and Burden of Disease in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-10, November.
    19. David Hsiehchen & Magdalena Espinoza & Antony Hsieh, 2017. "Disease burden and the advancement of biomedical knowledge," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(1), pages 321-333, January.
    20. Gavin Yamey & Carlos Morel, 2016. "Investing in Health Innovation: A Cornerstone to Achieving Global Health Convergence," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-5, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0105722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.