IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0101353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving the Efficiency of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Wall Stress Computations

Author

Listed:
  • Jaime E Zelaya
  • Sevan Goenezen
  • Phong T Dargon
  • Amir-Farzin Azarbal
  • Sandra Rugonyi

Abstract

An abdominal aortic aneurysm is a pathological dilation of the abdominal aorta, which carries a high mortality rate if ruptured. The most commonly used surrogate marker of rupture risk is the maximal transverse diameter of the aneurysm. More recent studies suggest that wall stress from models of patient-specific aneurysm geometries extracted, for instance, from computed tomography images may be a more accurate predictor of rupture risk and an important factor in AAA size progression. However, quantification of wall stress is typically computationally intensive and time-consuming, mainly due to the nonlinear mechanical behavior of the abdominal aortic aneurysm walls. These difficulties have limited the potential of computational models in clinical practice. To facilitate computation of wall stresses, we propose to use a linear approach that ensures equilibrium of wall stresses in the aneurysms. This proposed linear model approach is easy to implement and eliminates the burden of nonlinear computations. To assess the accuracy of our proposed approach to compute wall stresses, results from idealized and patient-specific model simulations were compared to those obtained using conventional approaches and to those of a hypothetical, reference abdominal aortic aneurysm model. For the reference model, wall mechanical properties and the initial unloaded and unstressed configuration were assumed to be known, and the resulting wall stresses were used as reference for comparison. Our proposed linear approach accurately approximates wall stresses for varying model geometries and wall material properties. Our findings suggest that the proposed linear approach could be used as an effective, efficient, easy-to-use clinical tool to estimate patient-specific wall stresses.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaime E Zelaya & Sevan Goenezen & Phong T Dargon & Amir-Farzin Azarbal & Sandra Rugonyi, 2014. "Improving the Efficiency of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Wall Stress Computations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0101353
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101353
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0101353
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0101353&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0101353?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenrui Hao & Shihua Gong & Shuonan Wu & Jinchao Xu & Michael R Go & Avner Friedman & Dai Zhu, 2017. "A mathematical model of aortic aneurysm formation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Lukas Bruder & Jaroslav Pelisek & Hans-Henning Eckstein & Michael W Gee, 2020. "Biomechanical rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms using clinical data: A patient-specific, probabilistic framework and comparative case-control study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0101353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.