IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0100227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using a Delphi Technique to Seek Consensus Regarding Definitions, Descriptions and Classification of Terms Related to Implicit and Explicit Forms of Motor Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Melanie Kleynen
  • Susy M Braun
  • Michel H Bleijlevens
  • Monique A Lexis
  • Sascha M Rasquin
  • Jos Halfens
  • Mark R Wilson
  • Anna J Beurskens
  • Rich S W Masters

Abstract

Background: Motor learning is central to domains such as sports and rehabilitation; however, often terminologies are insufficiently uniform to allow effective sharing of experience or translation of knowledge. A study using a Delphi technique was conducted to ascertain level of agreement between experts from different motor learning domains (i.e., therapists, coaches, researchers) with respect to definitions and descriptions of a fundamental conceptual distinction within motor learning, namely implicit and explicit motor learning. Methods: A Delphi technique was embedded in multiple rounds of a survey designed to collect and aggregate informed opinions of 49 international respondents with expertise related to motor learning. The survey was administered via an online survey program and accompanied by feedback after each round. Consensus was considered to be reached if ≥70% of the experts agreed on a topic. Results: Consensus was reached with respect to definitions of implicit and explicit motor learning, and seven common primary intervention strategies were identified in the context of implicit and explicit motor learning. Consensus was not reached with respect to whether the strategies promote implicit or explicit forms of learning. Discussion: The definitions and descriptions agreed upon may aid translation and transfer of knowledge between domains in the field of motor learning. Empirical and clinical research is required to confirm the accuracy of the definitions and to explore the feasibility of the strategies that were identified in research, everyday practice and education.

Suggested Citation

  • Melanie Kleynen & Susy M Braun & Michel H Bleijlevens & Monique A Lexis & Sascha M Rasquin & Jos Halfens & Mark R Wilson & Anna J Beurskens & Rich S W Masters, 2014. "Using a Delphi Technique to Seek Consensus Regarding Definitions, Descriptions and Classification of Terms Related to Implicit and Explicit Forms of Motor Learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0100227
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0100227
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0100227&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0100227?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rym Boulkedid & Hendy Abdoul & Marine Loustau & Olivier Sibony & Corinne Alberti, 2011. "Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-9, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tracey Smythe & Andrew Wainwright & Allen Foster & Christopher Lavy, 2017. "What is a good result after clubfoot treatment? A Delphi-based consensus on success by regional clubfoot trainers from across Africa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Miranda L van Hooff & Jan van Loon & Jacques van Limbeek & Marinus de Kleuver, 2014. "The Nijmegen Decision Tool for Chronic Low Back Pain. Development of a Clinical Decision Tool for Secondary or Tertiary Spine Care Specialists," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-12, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0100227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.