IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0098160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chromatin CKAP2, a New Proliferation Marker, as Independent Prognostic Indicator in Breast Cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Han-Seong Kim
  • Jae-Soo Koh
  • Yong-Bock Choi
  • Jungsil Ro
  • Hyun-Kyoung Kim
  • Mi-Kyung Kim
  • Byung-Ho Nam
  • Kyung-Tae Kim
  • Vishal Chandra
  • Hye-Sil Seol
  • Woo-Chul Noh
  • Eun-Kyu Kim
  • Joobae Park
  • Chang-Dae Bae
  • Kyeong-Man Hong

Abstract

Background: The level of proliferation activity is a strong prognostic or predictive indicator in breast cancer, but its optimal measurement is still in debate, necessitating new proliferation markers. In the present study, the prognostic significance of the CKAP2-positive cell count (CPCC), a new proliferation marker, was evaluated, and the results were compared with those for the mitotic activity index (MAI). Methods: This study included 375 early-stage breast cancer samples collected from two institutions between 2000 and 2006. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using a CKAP2 monoclonal antibody. Cox proportional hazard regression models were fitted to determine the association between the CPCC and relapse-free survival (RFS) amongst three groups formed on the basis of the CPCC or MAI value: groups 2 and 3 showing the middle and highest values, respectively, and group 1 the lowest. Results: After adjustment for age, T stage, N stage, HER2 status, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, institution, and year of surgical resection, the CPCC was associated with a significantly worse RFS {hazard ratio [HR] = 4.10 (95% CI: 1.64–10.29) for group 2; HR = 4.35 (95% CI: 2.04–10.35) for group 3}. Moreover, its prognostic significance was similar to or higher than that based on the MAI {HR = 2.05 (95% CI: 0.94–4.65) for group 2; HR = 2.35 (95% CI: 1.09–5.10) for group 3}. In subgroup analyses, the CPCC showed a prognostic significance in the luminal A and triple-negative subgroups, but not in the HER2-positive subgroup. Conclusions: Chromatin CKAP2 is an independent prognostic marker for RFS in early-stage breast cancer, and could potentially replace the MAI in clinical evaluation of proliferation activity. Additionally, our study results suggest that the prognostic significance of proliferation activity differs among the various subgroups of breast cancer.

Suggested Citation

  • Han-Seong Kim & Jae-Soo Koh & Yong-Bock Choi & Jungsil Ro & Hyun-Kyoung Kim & Mi-Kyung Kim & Byung-Ho Nam & Kyung-Tae Kim & Vishal Chandra & Hye-Sil Seol & Woo-Chul Noh & Eun-Kyu Kim & Joobae Park & C, 2014. "Chromatin CKAP2, a New Proliferation Marker, as Independent Prognostic Indicator in Breast Cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-10, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0098160
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0098160
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0098160&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0098160?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richard E Neapolitan & Xia Jiang, 2015. "Study of Integrated Heterogeneous Data Reveals Prognostic Power of Gene Expression for Breast Cancer Survival," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0098160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.