IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0096658.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prioritizing Countries for Interventions to Reduce Child Mortality: Tools for Maximizing the Impact of Mass Drug Administration of Azithromycin

Author

Listed:
  • Alastair I Matheson
  • Lisa E Manhart
  • Patricia B Pavlinac
  • Arianna R Means
  • Adam Akullian
  • Gillian A Levine
  • Julie Jacobson
  • Erin Shutes
  • Judd L Walson

Abstract

Background: As new interventions to reduce childhood mortality are identified, careful consideration must be given to identifying populations that could benefit most from them. Promising reductions in childhood mortality reported in a large cluster randomized trial of mass drug administration (MDA) of azithromycin (AZM) prompted the development of visually compelling, easy-to-use tools that synthesize country-specific data on factors that would influence both potential AZM benefit and MDA implementation success. Methodology/Principal Findings: We assessed the opportunity to reduce mortality and the feasibility of implementing such a program, creating Opportunity and Feasibility Indices, respectively. Countries with high childhood mortality were included. A Country Ranking Index combined key variables from the previous two Indices and applied a scoring system to identify high-priority countries. We compared four scenarios with varying weights given to each variable. Conclusions/Significance: These visually accessible tools can be adapted or refined to include other metrics deemed important by stakeholders, and provide a quantitative approach to prioritization for intervention implementation. The need to explicitly state metrics and their weighting encourages thoughtful and transparent decision making. The objective and data-driven approach promoted by the three Indices may foster more efficient use of resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Alastair I Matheson & Lisa E Manhart & Patricia B Pavlinac & Arianna R Means & Adam Akullian & Gillian A Levine & Julie Jacobson & Erin Shutes & Judd L Walson, 2014. "Prioritizing Countries for Interventions to Reduce Child Mortality: Tools for Maximizing the Impact of Mass Drug Administration of Azithromycin," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-6, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0096658
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096658
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096658&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0096658?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gregory S. Zaric & Margaret L. Brandeau, 2007. "A Little Planning Goes a Long Way: Multilevel Allocation of HIV Prevention Resources," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 27(1), pages 71-81, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Linus Nyiwul, 2021. "Epidemic Control and Resource Allocation: Approaches and Implications for the Management of COVID-19," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 9(2), pages 283-305, December.
    2. Stephanie Earnshaw & Katherine Hicks & Anke Richter & Amanda Honeycutt, 2007. "A linear programming model for allocating HIV prevention funds with state agencies: a pilot study," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 239-252, September.
    3. Monali Malvankar-Mehta & Bin Xie, 2012. "Optimal incentives for allocating HIV/AIDS prevention resources among multiple populations," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 327-338, December.
    4. Natalie Privett & Feryal Erhun, 2011. "Efficient Funding: Auditing in the Nonprofit Sector," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 471-488, October.
    5. Margaret Brandeau & Gregory Zaric, 2009. "Optimal investment in HIV prevention programs: more is not always better," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 27-37, March.
    6. Xuecheng Yin & İ. E. Büyüktahtakın, 2021. "A multi-stage stochastic programming approach to epidemic resource allocation with equity considerations," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 597-622, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0096658. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.