IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0095327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Image-Based Grouping during Binocular Rivalry Is Dictated by Eye-Of-Origin

Author

Listed:
  • Sjoerd M Stuit
  • Chris L E Paffen
  • Maarten J van der Smagt
  • Frans A J Verstraten

Abstract

Prolonged viewing of dichoptically presented images with different content results in perceptual alternations known as binocular rivalry. This phenomenon is thought to be the result of competition at a local level, where local rivalry zones interact to give rise to a single, global dominant percept. Certain perceived combinations that result from this local competition are known to last longer than others, which is referred to as grouping during binocular rivalry. In recent years, the phenomenon has been suggested to be the result of competition at both eye- and image-based processing levels, although the exact contribution from each level remains elusive. Here we use a paradigm designed specifically to quantify the contribution of eye- and image-based processing to grouping during rivalry. In this paradigm we used sine-wave gratings as well as upright and inverted faces, with and without binocular disparity-based occlusion. These stimuli and conditions were used because they are known to result in processing at different stages throughout the visual processing hierarchy. Specifically, more complex images were included in order to maximize the potential contribution of image-based grouping. In spite of this, our results show that increasing image complexity did not lead to an increase in the contribution of image-based processing to grouping during rivalry. In fact, the results show that grouping was primarily affected by the eye-of-origin of the image parts, irrespective of stimulus type. We suggest that image content affects grouping during binocular rivalry at low-level processing stages, where it is intertwined with eye-of-origin information.

Suggested Citation

  • Sjoerd M Stuit & Chris L E Paffen & Maarten J van der Smagt & Frans A J Verstraten, 2014. "Image-Based Grouping during Binocular Rivalry Is Dictated by Eye-Of-Origin," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0095327
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0095327
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0095327&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0095327?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank Tong & Stephen A. Engel, 2001. "Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation," Nature, Nature, vol. 411(6834), pages 195-199, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David F Little & Joel S Snyder & Mounya Elhilali, 2020. "Ensemble modeling of auditory streaming reveals potential sources of bistability across the perceptual hierarchy," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-31, April.
    2. Jennifer Chen & Wen Zhou & Denise Chen, 2012. "Binaral Rivalry in the Presence of Visual Perceptual and Semantic Influences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-5, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0095327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.