IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0094709.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Has Used Internal Company Documents for Biomedical and Public Health Research and Where Did They Find Them?

Author

Listed:
  • L Susan Wieland
  • Lainie Rutkow
  • S Swaroop Vedula
  • Christopher N Kaufmann
  • Lori M Rosman
  • Claire Twose
  • Nirosha Mahendraratnam
  • Kay Dickersin

Abstract

Objective: To describe the sources of internal company documents used in public health and healthcare research. Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase for articles using internal company documents to address a research question about a health-related topic. Our primary interest was where authors obtained internal company documents for their research. We also extracted information on type of company, type of research question, type of internal documents, and funding source. Results: Our searches identified 9,305 citations of which 357 were eligible. Scanning of reference lists and consultation with colleagues identified 4 additional articles, resulting in 361 included articles. Most articles examined internal tobacco company documents (325/361; 90%). Articles using documents from pharmaceutical companies (20/361; 6%) were the next most common. Tobacco articles used documents from repositories; pharmaceutical documents were from a range of sources. Most included articles relied upon internal company documents obtained through litigation (350/361; 97%). The research questions posed were primarily about company strategies to promote or position the company and its products (326/361; 90%). Most articles (346/361; 96%) used information from miscellaneous documents such as memos or letters, or from unspecified types of documents. When explicit information about study funding was provided (290/361 articles), the most common source was the US-based National Cancer Institute. We developed an alternative and more sensitive search targeted at identifying additional research articles using internal pharmaceutical company documents, but the search retrieved an impractical number of citations for review. Conclusions: Internal company documents provide an excellent source of information on health topics (e.g., corporate behavior, study data) exemplified by articles based on tobacco industry documents. Pharmaceutical and other industry documents appear to have been less used for research, indicating a need for funding for this type of research and well-indexed and curated repositories to provide researchers with ready access to the documents.

Suggested Citation

  • L Susan Wieland & Lainie Rutkow & S Swaroop Vedula & Christopher N Kaufmann & Lori M Rosman & Claire Twose & Nirosha Mahendraratnam & Kay Dickersin, 2014. "Who Has Used Internal Company Documents for Biomedical and Public Health Research and Where Did They Find Them?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0094709
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094709
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094709&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erick H Turner & Daniel Knoepflmacher & Lee Shapley, 2012. "Publication Bias in Antipsychotic Trials: An Analysis of Efficacy Comparing the Published Literature to the US Food and Drug Administration Database," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gil Amarilyo & Daniel E Furst & Jennifer M P Woo & Wen Li & Henning Bliddal & Robin Christensen & Simon Tarp, 2016. "Agreements and Discrepancies between FDA Reports and Journal Papers on Biologic Agents Approved for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Meta-Research Project," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, January.
    2. David Pontille & Didier Torny, 2013. "Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases," CSI Working Papers Series 031, Centre de Sociologie de l'Innovation (CSI), Mines ParisTech.
    3. Leandro Fórnias Machado de Rezende & Juan Pablo Rey-López & Thiago Hérick de Sá & Nicholas Chartres & Alice Fabbri & Lauren Powell & Emmanuel Stamatakis & Lisa Bero, 2018. "Reporting bias in the literature on the associations of health-related behaviors and statins with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0094709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.