IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0094163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms and Demographic Factors as a Pre-Screening Tool for Barrett’s Esophagus

Author

Listed:
  • Xinxue Liu
  • Angela Wong
  • Sudarshan R Kadri
  • Andrej Corovic
  • Maria O’Donovan
  • Pierre Lao-Sirieix
  • Laurence B Lovat
  • Rodney W Burnham
  • Rebecca C Fitzgerald

Abstract

Background: Barrett’s esophagus (BE) occurs as consequence of reflux and is a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. The current “gold-standard” for diagnosing BE is endoscopy which remains prohibitively expensive and impractical as a population screening tool. We aimed to develop a pre-screening tool to aid decision making for diagnostic referrals. Methodology/Principal Findings: A prospective (training) cohort of 1603 patients attending for endoscopy was used for identification of risk factors to develop a risk prediction model. Factors associated with BE in the univariate analysis were selected to develop prediction models that were validated in an independent, external cohort of 477 non-BE patients referred for endoscopy with symptoms of reflux or dyspepsia. Two prediction models were developed separately for columnar lined epithelium (CLE) of any length and using a stricter definition of intestinal metaplasia (IM) with segments ≥2 cm with areas under the ROC curves (AUC) of 0.72 (95%CI: 0.67–0.77) and 0.81 (95%CI: 0.76–0.86), respectively. The two prediction models included demographics (age, sex), symptoms (heartburn, acid reflux, chest pain, abdominal pain) and medication for “stomach” symptoms. These two models were validated in the independent cohort with AUCs of 0.61 (95%CI: 0.54–0.68) and 0.64 (95%CI: 0.52–0.77) for CLE and IM≥2 cm, respectively. Conclusions: We have identified and validated two prediction models for CLE and IM≥2 cm. Both models have fair prediction accuracies and can select out around 20% of individuals unlikely to benefit from investigation for Barrett’s esophagus. Such prediction models have the potential to generate useful cost-savings for BE screening among the symptomatic population.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinxue Liu & Angela Wong & Sudarshan R Kadri & Andrej Corovic & Maria O’Donovan & Pierre Lao-Sirieix & Laurence B Lovat & Rodney W Burnham & Rebecca C Fitzgerald, 2014. "Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms and Demographic Factors as a Pre-Screening Tool for Barrett’s Esophagus," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-8, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0094163
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094163
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094163&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0094163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Po-Hsiang Lin & Jer-Guang Hsieh & Hsien-Chung Yu & Jyh-Horng Jeng & Chiao-Lin Hsu & Chien-Hua Chen & Pin-Chieh Wu, 2021. "Risk Prediction of Barrett’s Esophagus in a Taiwanese Health Examination Center Based on Regression Models," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-10, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0094163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.