IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0094109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Underperformance of African Protected Area Networks and the Case for New Conservation Models: Insights from Zambia

Author

Listed:
  • Peter A Lindsey
  • Vincent R Nyirenda
  • Jonathan I Barnes
  • Matthew S Becker
  • Rachel McRobb
  • Craig J Tambling
  • W Andrew Taylor
  • Frederick G Watson
  • Michael t’Sas-Rolfes

Abstract

Many African protected areas (PAs) are not functioning effectively. We reviewed the performance of Zambia’s PA network and provide insights into how their effectiveness might be improved. Zambia’s PAs are under-performing in ecological, economic and social terms. Reasons include: a) rapidly expanding human populations, poverty and open-access systems in Game Management Areas (GMAs) resulting in widespread bushmeat poaching and habitat encroachment; b) underfunding of the Zambia Wildlife Authority (ZAWA) resulting in inadequate law enforcement; c) reliance of ZAWA on extracting revenues from GMAs to cover operational costs which has prevented proper devolution of user-rights over wildlife to communities; d) on-going marginalization of communities from legal benefits from wildlife; e) under-development of the photo-tourism industry with the effect that earnings are limited to a fraction of the PA network; f) unfavourable terms and corruption which discourage good practice and adequate investment by hunting operators in GMAs; g) blurred responsibilities regarding anti-poaching in GMAs resulting in under-investment by all stakeholders. The combined effect of these challenges has been a major reduction in wildlife densities in most PAs and the loss of habitat in GMAs. Wildlife fares better in areas with investment from the private and/or NGO sector and where human settlement is absent. There is a need for: elevated government funding for ZAWA; greater international donor investment in protected area management; a shift in the role of ZAWA such that they focus primarily on national parks while facilitating the development of wildlife-based land uses by other stakeholders elsewhere; and new models for the functioning of GMAs based on joint-ventures between communities and the private and/or NGO sector. Such joint-ventures should provide defined communities with ownership of land, user-rights over wildlife and aim to attract long-term private/donor investment. These recommendations are relevant for many of the under-funded PAs occurring in other African countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter A Lindsey & Vincent R Nyirenda & Jonathan I Barnes & Matthew S Becker & Rachel McRobb & Craig J Tambling & W Andrew Taylor & Frederick G Watson & Michael t’Sas-Rolfes, 2014. "Underperformance of African Protected Area Networks and the Case for New Conservation Models: Insights from Zambia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0094109
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094109
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094109&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0094109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank, 2007. "Zambia : Economic and Poverty Impact of Nature-based Tourism," World Bank Publications - Reports 7553, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. World Bank, 2021. "Banking on Protected Areas," World Bank Publications - Reports 35737, The World Bank Group.
    2. Wainwright, Warwick & Drucker, Adam G. & Maxted, Nigel & Brehm, Joana Magos & Ng’uni, Dickson & Moran, Dominic, 2019. "Estimating in situ conservation costs of Zambian crop wild relatives under alternative conservation goals," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 632-643.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0094109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.