IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0091727.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role of Conditioning and Verbal Suggestion in Placebo and Nocebo Effects on Itch

Author

Listed:
  • Danielle J P Bartels
  • Antoinette I M van Laarhoven
  • Elise A Haverkamp
  • Oliver H Wilder-Smith
  • A Rogier T Donders
  • Henriët van Middendorp
  • Peter C M van de Kerkhof
  • Andrea W M Evers

Abstract

Placebo and nocebo effects are known to play a key role in treatment effects in a wide variety of conditions. These effects have frequently been investigated with regard to pain and also in other physical sensations, but have hardly been investigated with regard to itch. In addition, neither in pain nor in any other physical sensation, the single and combined contribution of the expectancy mechanisms of conditioning and verbal suggestion have ever been investigated in both placebo and nocebo effects within one design. For the first time, the role of verbal suggestion and conditioning in placebo and nocebo effects on itch was experimentally investigated. Expectations about itch stimuli were induced in healthy subjects by verbal suggestion, conditioning, or a combination of both procedures, and compared with a control group without expectation induction. Itch was induced electrically by means of quantitative sensory testing. Significant placebo and nocebo effects were induced in the group in which combined procedures of conditioning and verbal suggestion were applied in comparison with the control group. The conditioning and verbal suggestion procedures applied individually did not induce significant placebo and nocebo effects when compared with the control group. The results of this study extend existing evidence on different physical sensations, like pain, by showing that also for itch, the combination of conditioning and verbal suggestion is most promising in inducing both placebo and nocebo effects. More research on placebo and nocebo effects at a perceptive and neurobiological level is warranted to further elucidate the common and specific mechanisms underlying placebo and nocebo effects on itch and other physical sensations.

Suggested Citation

  • Danielle J P Bartels & Antoinette I M van Laarhoven & Elise A Haverkamp & Oliver H Wilder-Smith & A Rogier T Donders & Henriët van Middendorp & Peter C M van de Kerkhof & Andrea W M Evers, 2014. "Role of Conditioning and Verbal Suggestion in Placebo and Nocebo Effects on Itch," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-8, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0091727
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0091727
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0091727&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0091727?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carmen Walter & Violeta Dimova & Julia Bu & Michael J Parnham & Bruno G Oertel & Jörn Lötsch, 2015. "Inverted Perceptual Judgment of Nociceptive Stimuli at Threshold Level following Inconsistent Cues," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0091727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.