IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0090708.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the Impact of Case Management in Vancouver’s Downtown Community Court: A Quasi-Experimental Design

Author

Listed:
  • Julian M Somers
  • Akm Moniruzzaman
  • Stefanie N Rezansoff
  • Michelle Patterson

Abstract

Background: Problem solving courts (PSC) have been implemented internationally, with a common objective to prevent reoffending by addressing criminogenic needs and strengthening social determinants of health. There has been no empirical research on the effectiveness of community courts, which are a form of PSC designed to harness community resources and inter-disciplinary expertise to reduce recidivism in a geographic catchment area. Method: We used the propensity score matching method to examine the effectiveness of Vancouver’s Downtown Community Court (DCC). We focused on the subset of DCC participants who were identified as having the highest criminogenic risk and were assigned to a case management team (CMT). A comparison group was derived using one-to-one matching on a large array variables including static and dynamic criminogenic factors, geography, and time. Reductions in offences (one year pre minus one year post) were compared between CMT and comparison groups. Results: Compared to other DCC offenders, those triaged to CMT (9.5% of the DCC population) had significantly higher levels of healthcare, social service use, and justice system involvement over the ten years prior to the index offence. Compared to matched offenders who received traditional court outcomes, those assigned to CMT (n = 249) exhibited significantly greater reductions in overall offending (p

Suggested Citation

  • Julian M Somers & Akm Moniruzzaman & Stefanie N Rezansoff & Michelle Patterson, 2014. "Examining the Impact of Case Management in Vancouver’s Downtown Community Court: A Quasi-Experimental Design," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-8, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0090708
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0090708
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0090708&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0090708?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. DeMatteo, David & LaDuke, Casey & Locklair, Benjamin R. & Heilbrun, Kirk, 2013. "Community-based alternatives for justice-involved individuals with severe mental illness: Diversion, problem-solving courts, and reentry," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 64-71.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christine M. Sarteschi, 2013. "Mentally Ill Offenders Involved With the U.S. Criminal Justice System," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(3), pages 21582440134, July.
    2. Stainbrook, Kristin & Penney, Darby & Elwyn, Laura, 2015. "The opportunities and challenges of multi-site evaluations: Lessons from the jail diversion and trauma recovery national cross-site evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 26-35.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0090708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.