IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0088881.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Outcomes of Maintenance Gefitinib for Locally Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Unknown EGFR Mutations: A Semi-Markov Model Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaohui Zeng
  • Jianhe Li
  • Liubao Peng
  • Yunhua Wang
  • Chongqing Tan
  • Gannong Chen
  • Xiaomin Wan
  • Qiong Lu
  • Lidan Yi

Abstract

Background: Maintenance gefitinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo in patients from eastern Asian with locally advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after four chemotherapeutic cycles (21 days per cycle) of first-line platinum-based combination chemotherapy without disease progression. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of maintenance gefitinib therapy after four chemotherapeutic cycle’s stand first-line platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with unknown EGFR mutations, from a Chinese health care system perspective. Methods and Findings: A semi-Markov model was designed to evaluate cost-effectiveness of the maintenance gefitinib treatment. Two-parametric Weibull and Log-logistic distribution were fitted to PFS and overall survival curves independently. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the stability of the model designed. The model base-case analysis suggested that maintenance gefitinib would increase benefits in a 1, 3, 6 or 10-year time horizon, with incremental $184,829, $19,214, $19,328, and $21,308 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, respectively. The most sensitive influential variable in the cost-effectiveness analysis was utility of PFS plus rash, followed by utility of PFS plus diarrhoea, utility of progressed disease, price of gefitinib, cost of follow-up treatment in progressed survival state, and utility of PFS on oral therapy. The price of gefitinib is the most significant parameter that could reduce the incremental cost per QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that the cost-effective probability of maintenance gefitinib was zero under the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $16,349 (3×per-capita gross domestic product of China). The sensitivity analyses all suggested that the model was robust. Conclusions: Maintenance gefitinib following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC with unknown EGFR mutations is not cost-effective. Decreasing the price of gefitinib may be a preferential choice for meeting widely treatment demands in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaohui Zeng & Jianhe Li & Liubao Peng & Yunhua Wang & Chongqing Tan & Gannong Chen & Xiaomin Wan & Qiong Lu & Lidan Yi, 2014. "Economic Outcomes of Maintenance Gefitinib for Locally Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Unknown EGFR Mutations: A Semi-Markov Model Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-9, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0088881
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088881
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0088881
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0088881&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0088881?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaohui Zeng & Jonathan Karnon & Siying Wang & Bin Wu & Xiaomin Wan & Liubao Peng, 2012. "The Cost of Treating Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Estimates from the Chinese Experience," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-7, October.
    2. Jackson Christopher H & Sharples Linda D & Thompson Simon G, 2010. "Survival Models in Health Economic Evaluations: Balancing Fit and Parsimony to Improve Prediction," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-31, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siying Wang & Liubao Peng & Jianhe Li & Xiaohui Zeng & Lihui Ouyang & Chongqing Tan & Qiong Lu, 2013. "A Trial-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Erlotinib Alone versus Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Eastern Asian Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-9, March.
    2. Shun Lu & Yongfeng Yu & Shijun Fu & Hongye Ren, 2018. "Cost-effectiveness of ALK testing and first-line crizotinib therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-12, October.
    3. Béranger Lueza & Audrey Mauguen & Jean-Pierre Pignon & Oliver Rivero-Arias & Julia Bonastre & MAR-LC Collaborative Group, 2016. "Difference in Restricted Mean Survival Time for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Using Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis: Evidence from a Case Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0088881. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.