IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0087382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Highly Detailed Administrative Data to Predict Pneumonia Mortality

Author

Listed:
  • Michael B Rothberg
  • Penelope S Pekow
  • Aruna Priya
  • Marya D Zilberberg
  • Raquel Belforti
  • Daniel Skiest
  • Tara Lagu
  • Thomas L Higgins
  • Peter K Lindenauer

Abstract

Background: Mortality prediction models generally require clinical data or are derived from information coded at discharge, limiting adjustment for presenting severity of illness in observational studies using administrative data. Objectives: To develop and validate a mortality prediction model using administrative data available in the first 2 hospital days. Research Design: After dividing the dataset into derivation and validation sets, we created a hierarchical generalized linear mortality model that included patient demographics, comorbidities, medications, therapies, and diagnostic tests administered in the first 2 hospital days. We then applied the model to the validation set. Subjects: Patients aged ≥18 years admitted with pneumonia between July 2007 and June 2010 to 347 hospitals in Premier, Inc.’s Perspective database. Measures: In hospital mortality. Results: The derivation cohort included 200,870 patients and the validation cohort had 50,037. Mortality was 7.2%. In the multivariable model, 3 demographic factors, 25 comorbidities, 41 medications, 7 diagnostic tests, and 9 treatments were associated with mortality. Factors that were most strongly associated with mortality included receipt of vasopressors, non-invasive ventilation, and bicarbonate. The model had a c-statistic of 0.85 in both cohorts. In the validation cohort, deciles of predicted risk ranged from 0.3% to 34.3% with observed risk over the same deciles from 0.1% to 33.7%. Conclusions: A mortality model based on detailed administrative data available in the first 2 hospital days had good discrimination and calibration. The model compares favorably to clinically based prediction models and may be useful in observational studies when clinical data are not available.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael B Rothberg & Penelope S Pekow & Aruna Priya & Marya D Zilberberg & Raquel Belforti & Daniel Skiest & Tara Lagu & Thomas L Higgins & Peter K Lindenauer, 2014. "Using Highly Detailed Administrative Data to Predict Pneumonia Mortality," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0087382
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0087382
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0087382&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0087382?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Pine & Harmon S. Jordan & Anne Elixhauser & Donald E. Fry & David C. Hoaglin & Barbara Jones & Roger Meimban & David Warner & Junius Gonzales, 2009. "Modifying ICD-9-CM Coding of Secondary Diagnoses to Improve Risk-Adjustment of Inpatient Mortality Rates," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 29(1), pages 69-81, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mieke Deschepper & Willem Waegeman & Dirk Vogelaers & Kristof Eeckloo, 2020. "Using structured pathology data to predict hospital-wide mortality at admission," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-11, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0087382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.