IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0087097.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Streetscape Complexity Based on the Statistics of Local Contrast and Spatial Frequency

Author

Listed:
  • André Cavalcante
  • Ahmed Mansouri
  • Lemya Kacha
  • Allan Kardec Barros
  • Yoshinori Takeuchi
  • Naoji Matsumoto
  • Noboru Ohnishi

Abstract

Streetscapes are basic urban elements which play a major role in the livability of a city. The visual complexity of streetscapes is known to influence how people behave in such built spaces. However, how and which characteristics of a visual scene influence our perception of complexity have yet to be fully understood. This study proposes a method to evaluate the complexity perceived in streetscapes based on the statistics of local contrast and spatial frequency. Here, 74 streetscape images from four cities, including daytime and nighttime scenes, were ranked for complexity by 40 participants. Image processing was then used to locally segment contrast and spatial frequency in the streetscapes. The statistics of these characteristics were extracted and later combined to form a single objective measure. The direct use of statistics revealed structural or morphological patterns in streetscapes related to the perception of complexity. Furthermore, in comparison to conventional measures of visual complexity, the proposed objective measure exhibits a higher correlation with the opinion of the participants. Also, the performance of this method is more robust regarding different time scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • André Cavalcante & Ahmed Mansouri & Lemya Kacha & Allan Kardec Barros & Yoshinori Takeuchi & Naoji Matsumoto & Noboru Ohnishi, 2014. "Measuring Streetscape Complexity Based on the Statistics of Local Contrast and Spatial Frequency," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0087097
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0087097
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0087097&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0087097?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Colin G. Johnson & Jon McCormack & Iria Santos & Juan Romero, 2019. "Understanding Aesthetics and Fitness Measures in Evolutionary Art Systems," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-14, March.
    2. Boeing, Geoff, 2018. "Measuring the Complexity of Urban Form and Design," SocArXiv bxhrz, Center for Open Science.
    3. Marianne Gatti & Markus Nollert & Elena Pibernik, 2022. "Regulating Façade Length for Streetscapes of Human Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Boeing, Geoff, 2017. "Methods and Measures for Analyzing Complex Street Networks and Urban Form," SocArXiv 93h82, Center for Open Science.
    5. Jing Zhao & Qi Guo, 2022. "Intelligent Assessment for Visual Quality of Streets: Exploration Based on Machine Learning and Large-Scale Street View Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0087097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.