IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0086014.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Quality Measures for Quality Improvement: The Perspective of Hospital Staff

Author

Listed:
  • Asgar Aghaei Hashjin
  • Hamid Ravaghi
  • Dionne S Kringos
  • Uzor C Ogbu
  • Claudia Fischer
  • Saeid Reza Azami
  • Niek S Klazinga

Abstract

Research objective: This study examines the perspectives of a range of key hospital staff on the use, importance, scientific background, availability of data, feasibility of data collection, cost benefit aspects and availability of professional personnel for measurement of quality indicators among Iranian hospitals. The study aims to facilitate the use of quality indicators to improve quality of care in hospitals. Study design: A cross-sectional study was conducted over the period 2009 to 2010. Staff at Iranian hospitals completed a self-administered questionnaire eliciting their views on organizational, clinical process, and outcome (clinical effectiveness, patient safety and patient centeredness) indicators. Population studied: 93 hospital frontline staff including hospital/nursing managers, medical doctors, nurses, and quality improvement/medical records officers in 48 general and specialized hospitals in Iran. Principal findings: On average, only 69% of respondents reported using quality indicators in practice at their affiliated hospitals. Respondents varied significantly in their reported use of organizational, clinical process and outcome quality indicators. Overall, clinical process and effectiveness indicators were reported to be least used. The reported use of indicators corresponded with their perceived level of importance. Quality indicators were reported to be used among clinical staff significantly more than among managerial staff. In total, 74% of the respondents reported to use obligatory indicators, while this was 68% for voluntary indicators (p

Suggested Citation

  • Asgar Aghaei Hashjin & Hamid Ravaghi & Dionne S Kringos & Uzor C Ogbu & Claudia Fischer & Saeid Reza Azami & Niek S Klazinga, 2014. "Using Quality Measures for Quality Improvement: The Perspective of Hospital Staff," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0086014
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0086014
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0086014&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0086014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Vos, M.L.G. & Graafmans, W.C. & Kooistra, M. & Meijboom, B.R. & van der Voort, P.H. & Westert, G.P., 2009. "Using quality indicators to improve hospital care : A review of the literature," Other publications TiSEM 5f462bc9-0ac0-47f7-8f97-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhichao Wang & Bao Hoang Nguyen & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2024. "Performance analysis of hospitals in Australia and its peers: a systematic and critical review," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 139-173, October.
    2. Gort, Marjan & Broekhuis, Manda & Regts, Gerdien, 2013. "How teams use indicators for quality improvement – A multiple-case study on the use of multiple indicators in multidisciplinary breast cancer teams," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 69-77.
    3. Beaussier, Anne-Laure & Demeritt, David & Griffiths, Alex & Rothstein, Henry, 2020. "Steering by their own lights: Why regulators across Europe use different indicators to measure healthcare quality," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(5), pages 501-510.
    4. Tello, Juan E. & Barbazza, Erica & Waddell, Kerry, 2020. "Review of 128 quality of care mechanisms: A framework and mapping for health system stewards," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 12-24.
    5. Wang, Jingjing & Zhao, Xian & Guo, Xiaoxin, 2019. "Optimizing wind turbine's maintenance policies under performance-based contract," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 626-634.
    6. Vos, Leti & Dückers, Michel L.A. & Wagner, Cordula & van Merode, Godefridus G., 2010. "Does case-mix based reimbursement stimulate the development of process-oriented care delivery?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 74-80, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0086014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.