IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0083159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Numerical Magnitude Affects Temporal Memories but Not Time Encoding

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenguang G Cai
  • Ruiming Wang

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that the perception of time is influenced by concurrent magnitude information (e.g., numerical magnitude in digits, spatial distance), but the locus of the effect is unclear, with some findings suggesting that concurrent magnitudes such as space affect temporal memories and others suggesting that numerical magnitudes in digits affect the clock speed during time encoding. The current paper reports 6 experiments in which participants perceived a stimulus duration and then reproduced it. We showed that though a digit of a large magnitude (e.g., 9), relative to a digit of a small magnitude (e.g., 2), led to a longer reproduced duration when the digits were presented during the perception of the stimulus duration, such a magnitude effect disappeared when the digits were presented during the reproduction of the stimulus duration. These findings disconfirm the account that large numerical magnitudes accelerate the speed of an internal clock during time encoding, as such an account incorrectly predicts that a large numerical magnitude should lead to a shorter reproduced duration when presented during reproduction. Instead, the findings suggest that numerical magnitudes, like other magnitudes such as space, affect temporal memories when numerical magnitudes and temporal durations are concurrently held in memory. Under this account, concurrent numerical magnitudes have the chance to influence the memory of the perceived duration when they are presented during perception but not when they are presented at the reproduction stage.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenguang G Cai & Ruiming Wang, 2014. "Numerical Magnitude Affects Temporal Memories but Not Time Encoding," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0083159
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0083159
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0083159&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0083159?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amir Homayoun Javadi & Clarisse Aichelburg, 2012. "When Time and Numerosity Interfere: The Longer the More, and the More the Longer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-9, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nadine Schlichting & Ritske de Jong & Hedderik van Rijn, 2018. "Robustness of individual differences in temporal interference effects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Lambrechts & Vincent Walsh & Virginie van Wassenhove, 2013. "Evidence Accumulation in the Magnitude System," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Amir Homayoun Javadi & Clarisse Aichelburg, 2013. "Training Enhances the Interference of Numerosity on Duration Judgement," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-8, January.
    3. Isabell Winkler & Madlen Glauer & Tilmann Betsch & Peter Sedlmeier, 2015. "The Impact of Attention on Judgments of Frequency and Duration," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Nadine Schlichting & Ritske de Jong & Hedderik van Rijn, 2018. "Robustness of individual differences in temporal interference effects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0083159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.