IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0079772.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Will an Unsupervised Self-Testing Strategy for HIV Work in Health Care Workers of South Africa? A Cross Sectional Pilot Feasibility Study

Author

Listed:
  • Nitika Pant Pai
  • Tarannum Behlim
  • Lameze Abrahams
  • Caroline Vadnais
  • Sushmita Shivkumar
  • Sabrina Pillay
  • Anke Binder
  • Roni Deli-Houssein
  • Nora Engel
  • Lawrence Joseph
  • Keertan Dheda

Abstract

Background: In South Africa, stigma, discrimination, social visibility and fear of loss of confidentiality impede health facility-based HIV testing. With 50% of adults having ever tested for HIV in their lifetime, private, alternative testing options are urgently needed. Non-invasive, oral self-tests offer a potential for a confidential, unsupervised HIV self-testing option, but global data are limited. Methods: A pilot cross-sectional study was conducted from January to June 2012 in health care workers based at the University of Cape Town, South Africa. An innovative, unsupervised, self-testing strategy was evaluated for feasibility; defined as completion of self-testing process (i.e., self test conduct, interpretation and linkage). An oral point-of-care HIV test, an Internet and paper-based self-test HIV applications, and mobile phones were synergized to create an unsupervised strategy. Self-tests were additionally confirmed with rapid tests on site and laboratory tests. Of 270 health care workers (18 years and above, of unknown HIV status approached), 251 consented for participation. Findings: Overall, about 91% participants rated a positive experience with the strategy. Of 251 participants, 126 evaluated the Internet and 125 the paper-based application successfully; completion rate of 99.2%. All sero-positives were linked to treatment (completion rate:100% (95% CI, 66.0–100). About half of sero-negatives were offered counselling on mobile phones; completion rate: 44.6% (95% CI, 38.0–51.0). A majority of participants (78.1%) were females, aged 18–24 years (61.4%). Nine participants were found sero-positive after confirmatory tests (prevalence 3.6% 95% CI, 1.8–6.9). Six of nine positive self-tests were accurately interpreted; sensitivity: 66.7% (95% CI, 30.9–91.0); specificity:100% (95% CI, 98.1–100). Interpretation: Our unsupervised self-testing strategy was feasible to operationalize in health care workers in South Africa. Linkages were successfully operationalized with mobile phones in all sero-positives and about half of the sero-negatives sought post-test counselling. Controlled trials and implementation research studies are needed before a scale-up is considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Nitika Pant Pai & Tarannum Behlim & Lameze Abrahams & Caroline Vadnais & Sushmita Shivkumar & Sabrina Pillay & Anke Binder & Roni Deli-Houssein & Nora Engel & Lawrence Joseph & Keertan Dheda, 2013. "Will an Unsupervised Self-Testing Strategy for HIV Work in Health Care Workers of South Africa? A Cross Sectional Pilot Feasibility Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-9, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0079772
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079772
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0079772
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0079772&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0079772?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nitika Pant Pai & Jigyasa Sharma & Sushmita Shivkumar & Sabrina Pillay & Caroline Vadnais & Lawrence Joseph & Keertan Dheda & Rosanna W Peeling, 2013. "Supervised and Unsupervised Self-Testing for HIV in High- and Low-Risk Populations: A Systematic Review," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Anderson, J.E. & Carey, J.W. & Taveras, S., 2000. "HIV testing among the general US population and persons at increased risk: Information from national surveys, 1987-1996," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 90(7), pages 1089-1095.
    3. Luis de la Fuente & María Elena Rosales-Statkus & Juan Hoyos & José Pulido & Sara Santos & María José Bravo & Gregorio Barrio & Sonia Fernández-Balbuena & María José Belza & the Madrid Rapid HIV Testi, 2012. "Are Participants in a Street-Based HIV Testing Program Able to Perform Their Own Rapid Test and Interpret the Results?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-10, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joanita Nangendo & Ekwaro A Obuku & Ismael Kawooya & John Mukisa & Annet Nalutaaya & Angella Musewa & Fred C Semitala & Charles A Karamagi & Joan N Kalyango, 2017. "Diagnostic accuracy and acceptability of rapid HIV oral testing among adults attending an urban public health facility in Kampala, Uganda," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Katrina Ortblad & Daniel Kibuuka Musoke & Thomson Ngabirano & Aidah Nakitende & Jonathan Magoola & Prossy Kayiira & Geoffrey Taasi & Leah G Barresi & Jessica E Haberer & Margaret A McConnell & Catheri, 2017. "Direct provision versus facility collection of HIV self-tests among female sex workers in Uganda: A cluster-randomized controlled health systems trial," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-24, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0079772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.