IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0078003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Refractive Errors in 3–6 Year-Old Chinese Children: A Very Low Prevalence of Myopia?

Author

Listed:
  • Weizhong Lan
  • Feng Zhao
  • Lixia Lin
  • Zhen Li
  • Junwen Zeng
  • Zhikuan Yang
  • Ian G Morgan

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the prevalence of refractive errors in children aged 3–6 years in China. Methods: Children were recruited for a trial of a home-based amblyopia screening kit in Guangzhou preschools, during which cycloplegic refractions were measured in both eyes of 2480 children. Cycloplegic refraction (from 3 to 4 drops of 1% cyclopentolate to ensure abolition of the light reflex) was measured by both autorefraction and retinoscopy. Refractive errors were defined as followed: myopia (at least −0.50 D in the worse eye), hyperopia (at least +2.00 D in the worse eye) and astigmatism (at least 1.50 D in the worse eye). Different definitions, as specified in the text, were also used to facilitate comparison with other studies. Results: The mean spherical equivalent refractive error was at least +1.22 D for all ages and both genders. The prevalence of myopia for any definition at any age was at most 2.5%, and lower in most cases. In contrast, the prevalence of hyperopia was generally over 20%, and declined slightly with age. The prevalence of astigmatism was between 6% and 11%. There was very little change in refractive error with age over this age range. Conclusions: Previous reports of less hyperopic mean spherical equivalent refractive error, and more myopia and less hyperopia in children of this age may be due to problems with achieving adequate cycloplegia in children with dark irises. Using up to 4 drops of 1% cyclopentolate may be necessary to accurately measure refractive error in paediatric studies of such children. Our results suggest that children from all ethnic groups may follow a similar pattern of early refractive development, with little myopia and a hyperopic mean spherical equivalent over +1.00 D up to the age of 5–6 yearsin most conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Weizhong Lan & Feng Zhao & Lixia Lin & Zhen Li & Junwen Zeng & Zhikuan Yang & Ian G Morgan, 2013. "Refractive Errors in 3–6 Year-Old Chinese Children: A Very Low Prevalence of Myopia?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-8, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0078003
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0078003
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0078003&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0078003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuan Yuan Hu & Jian Feng Wu & Tai Liang Lu & Hui Wu & Wei Sun & Xing Rong Wang & Hong Sheng Bi & Jost B Jonas, 2015. "Effect of Cycloplegia on the Refractive Status of Children: The Shandong Children Eye Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-10, February.
    2. Han-Chih Cheng & Koyin Chang & Elizabeth Shen & Kai-Shin Luo & Yung-Hsiang Ying, 2020. "Risk Factors and Behaviours of Schoolchildren with Myopia in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-12, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0078003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.