IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0076389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Method for Detecting Positive Growth Autocorrelation without Marking Individuals

Author

Listed:
  • Mollie E Brooks
  • Michael W McCoy
  • Benjamin M Bolker

Abstract

In most ecological studies, within-group variation is a nuisance that obscures patterns of interest and reduces statistical power. However, patterns of within-group variability often contain information about ecological processes. In particular, such patterns can be used to detect positive growth autocorrelation (consistent variation in growth rates among individuals in a cohort across time), even in samples of unmarked individuals. Previous methods for detecting autocorrelated growth required data from marked individuals. We propose a method that requires only estimates of within-cohort variance through time, using maximum likelihood methods to obtain point estimates and confidence intervals of the correlation parameter. We test our method on simulated data sets and determine the loss in statistical power due to the inability to identify individuals. We show how to accommodate nonlinear growth trajectories and test the effects of size-dependent mortality on our method's accuracy. The method can detect significant growth autocorrelation at moderate levels of autocorrelation with moderate-sized cohorts (for example, statistical power of 80% to detect growth autocorrelation ρ2 = 0.5 in a cohort of 100 individuals measured on 16 occasions). We present a case study of growth in the red-eyed tree frog. Better quantification of the processes driving size variation will help ecologists improve predictions of population dynamics. This work will help researchers to detect growth autocorrelation in cases where marking is logistically infeasible or causes unacceptable decreases in the fitness of marked individuals.

Suggested Citation

  • Mollie E Brooks & Michael W McCoy & Benjamin M Bolker, 2013. "A Method for Detecting Positive Growth Autocorrelation without Marking Individuals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-8, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0076389
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0076389
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0076389&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0076389?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claire Saraux & Céline Le Bohec & Joël M. Durant & Vincent A. Viblanc & Michel Gauthier-Clerc & David Beaune & Young-Hyang Park & Nigel G. Yoccoz & Nils C. Stenseth & Yvon Le Maho, 2011. "Erratum: Reliability of flipper-banded penguins as indicators of climate change," Nature, Nature, vol. 471(7337), pages 254-254, March.
    2. Claire Saraux & Céline Le Bohec & Joël M. Durant & Vincent A. Viblanc & Michel Gauthier-Clerc & David Beaune & Young-Hyang Park & Nigel G. Yoccoz & Nils C. Stenseth & Yvon Le Maho, 2011. "Reliability of flipper-banded penguins as indicators of climate change," Nature, Nature, vol. 469(7329), pages 203-206, January.
    3. Robert M. May, 2004. "Ethics and amphibians," Nature, Nature, vol. 431(7007), pages 403-403, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Colyvan, 2016. "Value of information and monitoring in conservation biology," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 302-309, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0076389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.