IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0074467.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Size of Endotracheal Tube and Sore Throat after Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Baoji Hu
  • Rui Bao
  • Xiaolin Wang
  • Shanshan Liu
  • Tianzhu Tao
  • Qun Xie
  • Xiongwei Yu
  • Jinbao Li
  • Lulong Bo
  • Xiaoming Deng

Abstract

Background: Recent studies showed that sore throat following endotracheal intubation was a common problem following surgery. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies was to estimate whether the size of endotracheal tube (ETT) affects the incidence of postoperative sore throat (POST) after general anesthesia. Methods: The following databases were searched electronically: PubMed (updated to Dec 2012), EMBASE (updated to 15 Dec 2012), Google scholar, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (Jul 2011), Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (1978 to Jul 2011), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (1994 to Jul 2011). Studies comparing the size of endotracheal tube for elective surgery were included. Results: Three trials with a total of 509 female patients were included in the current analysis. The size of ETT used were 6.0 mm and 7.0 mm. Pooled studies from these trials showed that the smaller size of ETT (6.0 mm) significantly decreased the incidence of POST in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (RR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.42–0.75, P 0.05). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis suggests that patients under general anesthesia with a smaller size of ETT (6.0 mm) were associated with a lower incidence of POST in female patients. More studies with adequate numbers of patients were warranted to evaluate other size of ETT on the incidence of PH and POST after general surgery among different populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Baoji Hu & Rui Bao & Xiaolin Wang & Shanshan Liu & Tianzhu Tao & Qun Xie & Xiongwei Yu & Jinbao Li & Lulong Bo & Xiaoming Deng, 2013. "The Size of Endotracheal Tube and Sore Throat after Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-7, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0074467
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0074467
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0074467&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0074467?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anja Hetland Smeland & Tone Rustøen & Torgun Næss & Lill Nybro & Stefan Lundeberg & Hanne Reinertsen & Trond H. Diseth & Alison Twycross, 2019. "Children’s views on postsurgical pain in recovery units in Norway: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(11-12), pages 2157-2170, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0074467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.