IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0074378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Burden of Bacterial Vaginosis: Women’s Experience of the Physical, Emotional, Sexual and Social Impact of Living with Recurrent Bacterial Vaginosis

Author

Listed:
  • Jade E Bilardi
  • Sandra Walker
  • Meredith Temple-Smith
  • Ruth McNair
  • Julie Mooney-Somers
  • Clare Bellhouse
  • Christopher K Fairley
  • Marcus Y Chen
  • Catriona Bradshaw

Abstract

Background: Bacterial vaginosis is a common vaginal infection, causing an abnormal vaginal discharge and/or odour in up to 50% of sufferers. Recurrence is common following recommended treatment. There are limited data on women’s experience of bacterial vaginosis, and the impact on their self-esteem, sexual relationships and quality of life. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences and impact of recurrent bacterial vaginosis on women. Methods: A social constructionist approach was chosen as the framework for the study. Thirty five women with male and/or female partners participated in semi-structured interviews face-to-face or by telephone about their experience of recurrent bacterial vaginosis. Results: Recurrent bacterial vaginosis impacted on women to varying degrees, with some women reporting it had little impact on their lives but most reporting it had a moderate to severe impact. The degree to which it impacted on women physically, emotionally, sexually and socially often depended on the frequency of episodes and severity of symptoms. Women commonly reported that symptoms of bacterial vaginosis made them feel embarrassed, ashamed, ‘dirty’ and very concerned others may detect their malodour and abnormal discharge. The biggest impact of recurrent bacterial vaginosis was on women’s self-esteem and sex lives, with women regularly avoiding sexual activity, in particular oral sex, as they were too embarrassed and self-conscious of their symptoms to engage in these activities. Women often felt confused about why they were experiencing recurrent bacterial vaginosis and frustrated at their lack of control over recurrence. Conclusion: Women’s experience of recurrent bacterial vaginosis varied broadly and significantly in this study. Some women reported little impact on their lives but most reported a moderate to severe impact, mainly on their self-esteem and sex life. Further support and acknowledgement of these impacts are required when managing women with recurrent bacterial vaginosis.

Suggested Citation

  • Jade E Bilardi & Sandra Walker & Meredith Temple-Smith & Ruth McNair & Julie Mooney-Somers & Clare Bellhouse & Christopher K Fairley & Marcus Y Chen & Catriona Bradshaw, 2013. "The Burden of Bacterial Vaginosis: Women’s Experience of the Physical, Emotional, Sexual and Social Impact of Living with Recurrent Bacterial Vaginosis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0074378
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0074378
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0074378&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0074378?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catriona S Bradshaw & Jennifer Walker & Christopher K Fairley & Marcus Y Chen & Sepehr N Tabrizi & Basil Donovan & John M Kaldor & Kathryn McNamee & Eve Urban & Sandra Walker & Marian Currie & Hudson , 2013. "Prevalent and Incident Bacterial Vaginosis Are Associated with Sexual and Contraceptive Behaviours in Young Australian Women," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-8, March.
    2. Holzman, C. & Leventhal, J.M. & Qiu, H. & Jones, N.M. & Wang, J., 2001. "Factors linked to bacterial vaginosis in nonpregnant women," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(10), pages 1664-1670.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dana S Forcey & Lenka A Vodstrcil & Jane S Hocking & Christopher K Fairley & Matthew Law & Ruth P McNair & Catriona S Bradshaw, 2015. "Factors Associated with Bacterial Vaginosis among Women Who Have Sex with Women: A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lenka A Vodstrcil & Jane S Hocking & Matthew Law & Sandra Walker & Sepehr N Tabrizi & Christopher K Fairley & Catriona S Bradshaw, 2013. "Hormonal Contraception Is Associated with a Reduced Risk of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Giorgia Caruso & Anna Giammanco & Roberta Virruso & Teresa Fasciana, 2021. "Current and Future Trends in the Laboratory Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Infections," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Paul, Kathleen & Boutain, Doris & Manhart, Lisa & Hitti, Jane, 2008. "Racial disparity in bacterial vaginosis: the role of socioeconomic status, psychosocial stress, and neighborhood characteristics, and possible implications for preterm birth," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 824-833, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0074378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.