IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0072136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Females Paired with New and Heavy Mates Reduce Intra-Clutch Differences in Resource Allocation

Author

Listed:
  • Maud Poisbleau
  • Nina Dehnhard
  • Laurent Demongin
  • Charline Parenteau
  • Petra Quillfeldt
  • Marcel Eens

Abstract

Reproductive investment affects both offspring and parental fitness and influences the evolution of life histories. Females may vary their overall primary reproductive effort in relation to the phenotypic characteristics of their mate. However, the effects of male quality on differential resource allocation within clutches have been largely neglected despite the potential implications for mate choice and population dynamics, especially in species exhibiting biparental care and brood reduction. Female southern rockhopper penguins Eudyptes chrysocome paired with heavy mates reduced intra-clutch variation in egg and albumen masses. Females paired with new mates also reduced intra-clutch variation in yolk androgen levels. Since both an increased mass and increased androgen concentrations positively influence chick survival under sibling competition, the chances of fledging the whole clutch are likely to be higher for newly formed pairs with heavy males than for previously formed pairs with light males. Interestingly, total clutch provisioning did not vary with male quality. We show for the first time that females vary intra-clutch variation in resource allocation according to male quality. In species with brood reduction, it may be more adaptive for females to modulate the distribution of resources within the clutch according to breeding conditions, than to change their total clutch provisioning.

Suggested Citation

  • Maud Poisbleau & Nina Dehnhard & Laurent Demongin & Charline Parenteau & Petra Quillfeldt & Marcel Eens, 2013. "Females Paired with New and Heavy Mates Reduce Intra-Clutch Differences in Resource Allocation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-8, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0072136
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0072136
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0072136&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0072136?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hubert Schwabl & Douglas W. Mock & Jennifer A. Gieg, 1997. "A hormonal mechanism for parental favouritism," Nature, Nature, vol. 386(6622), pages 231-231, March.
    2. Emma J. A. Cunningham & Andrew F. Russell, 2000. "Egg investment is influenced by male attractiveness in the mallard," Nature, Nature, vol. 404(6773), pages 74-77, March.
    3. Wendt Müller & Sofie Boonen & Ton G.G. Groothuis & Marcel Eens, 2010. "Maternal yolk testosterone in canary eggs: toward a better understanding of mechanisms and function," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(3), pages 493-500.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oscar Rios-Cardenas & Jason Brewer & Molly R Morris, 2013. "Maternal Investment in the Swordtail Fish Xiphophorus multilineatus: Support for the Differential Allocation Hypothesis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-1, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0072136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.