IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0063894.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-Effectiveness of a Community Pharmacist-Led Sleep Apnea Screening Program – A Markov Model

Author

Listed:
  • Clémence Perraudin
  • Marc Le Vaillant
  • Nathalie Pelletier-Fleury

Abstract

Background: Despite the high prevalence and major public health ramifications, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) remains underdiagnosed. In many developed countries, because community pharmacists (CP) are easily accessible, they have been developing additional clinical services that integrate the services of and collaborate with other healthcare providers (general practitioners (GPs), nurses, etc.). Alternative strategies for primary care screening programs for OSAS involving the CP are discussed. Objective: To estimate the quality of life, costs, and cost-effectiveness of three screening strategies among patients who are at risk of having moderate to severe OSAS in primary care. Design: Markov decision model. Data Sources: Published data. Target Population: Hypothetical cohort of 50-year-old male patients with symptoms highly evocative of OSAS. Time Horizon: The 5 years after initial evaluation for OSAS. Perspective: Societal. Interventions: Screening strategy with CP (CP-GP collaboration), screening strategy without CP (GP alone) and no screening. Outcomes measures: Quality of life, survival and costs for each screening strategy. Results of base-case analysis: Under almost all modeled conditions, the involvement of CPs in OSAS screening was cost effective. The maximal incremental cost for “screening strategy with CP” was about 455€ per QALY gained. Results of sensitivity analysis: Our results were robust but primarily sensitive to the treatment costs by continuous positive airway pressure, and the costs of untreated OSAS. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the “screening strategy with CP” was dominant in 80% of cases. It was more effective and less costly in 47% of cases, and within the cost-effective range (maximum incremental cost effectiveness ratio at €6186.67/QALY) in 33% of cases. Conclusions: CP involvement in OSAS screening is a cost-effective strategy. This proposal is consistent with the trend in Europe and the United States to extend the practices and responsibilities of the pharmacist in primary care.

Suggested Citation

  • Clémence Perraudin & Marc Le Vaillant & Nathalie Pelletier-Fleury, 2013. "Cost-Effectiveness of a Community Pharmacist-Led Sleep Apnea Screening Program – A Markov Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-9, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0063894
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063894
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0063894
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0063894&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0063894?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sabrine Elkhodr & Maya Saba & Claire O’Reilly & Bandana Saini, 2018. "The role of community pharmacists in the identification and ongoing management of women at risk for perinatal depression: A qualitative study," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 64(1), pages 37-48, February.
    2. Perraudin, Clémence & Bugnon, Olivier & Pelletier-Fleury, Nathalie, 2016. "Expanding professional pharmacy services in European community setting: Is it cost-effective? A systematic review for health policy considerations," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(12), pages 1350-1362.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0063894. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.