IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0062796.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of an Ecosystem Engineer on Belowground Movement of Microarthropods

Author

Listed:
  • Erin K Cameron
  • Heather C Proctor
  • Erin M Bayne

Abstract

: Ecosystem engineers affect other species by changing physical environments. Such changes may influence movement of organisms, particularly belowground where soil permeability can restrict dispersal. We investigated whether earthworms, iconic ecosystem engineers, influence microarthropod movement. Our experiment tested whether movement is affected by tunnels (i.e., burrows), earthworm excreta (mucus, castings), or earthworms themselves. Earthworm burrows form tunnel networks that may facilitate movement. This effect may be enhanced by excreta, which could provide resources for microarthropods moving along the network. Earthworms may also promote movement via phoresy. Conversely, negative effects could occur if earthworms alter predator-prey relationships or change competitive interactions between microarthropods. We used microcosms consisting of a box connecting a “source” container in which microarthropods were present and a “destination” container filled with autoclaved soil. Treatments were set up within the boxes, which also contained autoclaved soil, as follows: 1) control with no burrows; 2) artificial burrows with no excreta; 3) abandoned burrows with excreta but no earthworms; and 4) earthworms (Lumbricus rubellus) present in burrows. Half of the replicates were sampled once after eight days, while the other half were sampled repeatedly to examine movement over time. Rather than performing classical pairwise comparisons to test our hypotheses, we used AICc to assess support for three competing models (presence of tunnels, excreta, and earthworms). More individuals of Collembola, Mesostigmata, and all microarthropods together dispersed when tunnels were present. Models that included excreta and earthworms were less well supported. Total numbers of dispersing Oribatida and Prostigmata+Astigmata were not well explained by any models tested. Further research is needed to examine the impact of soil structure and ecosystem engineering on movement belowground, as the substantial increase in movement of some microarthropods when corridors were present suggests these factors can strongly affect colonization and community assembly.

Suggested Citation

  • Erin K Cameron & Heather C Proctor & Erin M Bayne, 2013. "Effects of an Ecosystem Engineer on Belowground Movement of Microarthropods," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-9, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0062796
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062796
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062796&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0062796?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hoyle, Martin, 2007. "When corridors work: Insights from a microecosystem," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 441-453.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yizhou Tao & Wenhao Hu & Wenjing Wang & Lan He & Wenhui Xu, 2024. "Bird Diversity in Suburban Greenway Was Driven by Habitat Heterogeneity and Landscape Patterns in Autumn–Winter Seasons—Evidence from Hangzhou Qingshan Lake Greenway," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Wang, Qian & Malanson, George P., 2008. "Spatial hyperdynamism in a post-disturbance simulated forest," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 215(4), pages 337-344.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0062796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.