IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0059128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Studies of Copy Number Variation Detection Methods for Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Junbo Duan
  • Ji-Gang Zhang
  • Hong-Wen Deng
  • Yu-Ping Wang

Abstract

Copy number variation (CNV) has played an important role in studies of susceptibility or resistance to complex diseases. Traditional methods such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) suffer from low resolution of genomic regions. Following the emergence of next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, CNV detection methods based on the short read data have recently been developed. However, due to the relatively young age of the procedures, their performance is not fully understood. To help investigators choose suitable methods to detect CNVs, comparative studies are needed. We compared six publicly available CNV detection methods: CNV-seq, FREEC, readDepth, CNVnator, SegSeq and event-wise testing (EWT). They are evaluated both on simulated and real data with different experiment settings. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is employed to demonstrate the detection performance in terms of sensitivity and specificity, box plot is employed to compare their performances in terms of breakpoint and copy number estimation, Venn diagram is employed to show the consistency among these methods, and F-score is employed to show the overlapping quality of detected CNVs. The computational demands are also studied. The results of our work provide a comprehensive evaluation on the performances of the selected CNV detection methods, which will help biological investigators choose the best possible method.

Suggested Citation

  • Junbo Duan & Ji-Gang Zhang & Hong-Wen Deng & Yu-Ping Wang, 2013. "Comparative Studies of Copy Number Variation Detection Methods for Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-12, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0059128
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059128
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059128&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0059128?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marc-André Legault & Simon Girard & Louis-Philippe Lemieux Perreault & Guy A Rouleau & Marie-Pierre Dubé, 2015. "Comparison of Sequencing Based CNV Discovery Methods Using Monozygotic Twin Quartets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-12, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0059128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.