Author
Listed:
- Jihad Mallat
- Stéphanie Barrailler
- Malcolm Lemyze
- Florent Pepy
- Gaëlle Gasan
- Laurent Tronchon
- Didier Thevenin
Abstract
Introduction: To investigate whether the difference between sodium and chloride ([Na+] – [Cl−]) and anion gap corrected for albumin and lactate (AGcorr) could be used as apparent strong ion difference (SIDapp) and strong ion gap (SIG) surrogates (respectively) in critically ill patients. Methods: A total of 341 patients were prospectively observed; 161 were allocated to the modeling group, and 180 to the validation group. Simple regression analysis was used to construct a mathematical model between SIDapp and [Na+] – [Cl−] and between SIG and AGcorr in the modeling group. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was also measured. The mathematical models were tested in the validation group. Results: in the modeling group, SIDapp and SIG were well predicted by [Na+] – [Cl−] and AGcorr (R2 = 0.973 and 0.96, respectively). Accuracy values of [Na+] – [Cl−] for the identification of SIDapp acidosis ( 47.5 mEq/L) were 0.992 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.963–1) and 0.998 (95%CI, 0.972–1), respectively. The accuracy of AGcorr in revealing SIG acidosis (>8 mEq/L) was 0.974 (95%CI: 0.936–0.993). These results were validated by showing excellent correlations and good agreements between predicted and measured SIDapp and between predicted and measured SIG in the validation group (R2 = 0.977; bias = 0±1.5 mEq/L and R2 = 0.96; bias = −0.2±1.8 mEq/L, respectively). Conclusions: SIDapp and SIG can be substituted by [Na+] – [Cl−] and by AGcorr respectively in the diagnosis and management of acid-base disorders in critically ill patients.
Suggested Citation
Jihad Mallat & Stéphanie Barrailler & Malcolm Lemyze & Florent Pepy & Gaëlle Gasan & Laurent Tronchon & Didier Thevenin, 2013.
"Use of Sodium-Chloride Difference and Corrected Anion Gap as Surrogates of Stewart Variables in Critically Ill Patients,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-8, February.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0056635
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056635
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0056635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.