IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0055012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Community Participation on Improving Uptake of Skilled Care for Maternal and Newborn Health: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Cicely Marston
  • Alicia Renedo
  • C R McGowan
  • Anayda Portela

Abstract

Background: Despite a broad consensus that communities should be actively involved in improving their own health, evidence for the effect of community participation on specific health outcomes is limited. We examine the effectiveness of community participation interventions in maternal and newborn health, asking: did participation improve outcomes? We also look at how the impact of community participation has been assessed, particularly through randomised controlled trials, and make recommendations for future research. We highlight the importance of qualitative investigation, suggesting key areas for qualitative data reporting alongside quantitative work. Methods and findings: Systematic review of published and ‘grey’ literature from 1990. We searched 11 databases, and followed up secondary references. Main outcome measures were the use of skilled care before/during/after birth and maternal/newborn mortality/morbidity. We included qualitative and quantitative studies from any country, and used a community participation theoretical framework to analyse the data. We found 10 interventions. Community participation had largely positive impacts on maternal/newborn health as part of a package of interventions, although not necessarily on uptake of skilled care. Interventions improving mortality or use of skilled care raised awareness, encouraged dialogue and involved communities in designing solutions–but so did those showing no effect. Discussion: There are few high-quality, quantitative studies. We also lack information about why participation interventions do/do not succeed – an area of obvious interest for programme designers. Qualitative investigation can help fill this information gap and should be at the heart of future quantitative research examining participation interventions – in maternal/newborn health, and more widely. This review illustrates the need for qualitative investigation alongside RCTs and other quantitative studies to understand complex interventions in context, describe predicted and unforeseen impacts, assess potential for generalisability, and capture the less easily measurable social/political effects of encouraging participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Cicely Marston & Alicia Renedo & C R McGowan & Anayda Portela, 2013. "Effects of Community Participation on Improving Uptake of Skilled Care for Maternal and Newborn Health: A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-10, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0055012
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0055012
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0055012&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0055012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Draper, Alizon Katharine & Hewitt, Gillian & Rifkin, Susan, 2010. "Chasing the dragon: Developing indicators for the assessment of community participation in health programmes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(6), pages 1102-1109, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nunn, Jack S & Shafee, Thomas, 2021. "Standardised Data on Initiatives – STARDIT: Beta Version," OSF Preprints w5xj6_v1, Center for Open Science.
    2. CUERVO, Luis Gabriel MD, MSc, SFM & Cuervo, Daniel & Hatcher-Roberts, Janet & Herrera, Eliana Martínez & Pinilla, Luis Fernando & Piquero, Felipe & Ospina, Maria B & Molina, Ciro Jaramillo, 2021. "AMORE Project: Integrated knowledge translation and geospatial analysis to improve travel times to health services (accessibility) and health equity in Cali, Colombia: a proof of concept using mixed-m," Thesis Commons 4atqc_v1, Center for Open Science.
    3. Luisi, Daniela & Hämel, Kerstin, 2021. "Community participation and empowerment in primary health care in Emilia-Romagna: A document analysis study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 177-184.
    4. Ratanavaraha, Vatanavongs & Jomnonkwao, Sajjakaj, 2013. "Community participation and behavioral changes of helmet use in Thailand," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 111-118.
    5. Jung, Minsoo & Viswanath, K., 2013. "Does community capacity influence self-rated health? Multilevel contextual effects in Seoul, Korea," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 60-69.
    6. Montesanti, Stephanie Rose & Abelson, Julia & Lavis, John N. & Dunn, James R., 2015. "The value of frameworks as knowledge translation mechanisms to guide community participation practice in Ontario CHCs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 223-231.
    7. Madon, Shirin & Malecela, Mwele Ntuli & Mashoto, Kijakazi & Donohue, Rose & Mubyazi, Godfrey & Michael, Edwin, 2018. "The role of community participation for sustainable integrated neglected tropical diseases and water, sanitation and hygiene intervention programs: A pilot project in Tanzania," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 28-37.
    8. Farmer, Jane & Currie, Margaret & Kenny, Amanda & Munoz, Sarah-Anne, 2015. "An exploration of the longer-term impacts of community participation in rural health services design," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 64-71.
    9. Prata, Ndola & Ejembi, Clara & Fraser, Ashley & Shittu, Oladapo & Minkler, Meredith, 2012. "Community mobilization to reduce postpartum hemorrhage in home births in northern Nigeria," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(8), pages 1288-1296.
    10. Atinga, Roger A. & Agyepong, Irene Akua & Esena, Reuben K., 2019. "Willing but unable? Extending theory to investigate community capacity to participate in Ghana’s community-based health planning and service implementation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 170-178.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0055012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.