Author
Listed:
- Jie Song
- Alok S Desphande
- Timothy B Meier
- Dana L Tudorascu
- Svyatoslav Vergun
- Veena A Nair
- Bharat B Biswal
- Mary E Meyerand
- Rasmus M Birn
- Pierre Bellec
- Vivek Prabhakaran
Abstract
Resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) has emerged as a powerful tool for investigating brain functional connectivity (FC). Research in recent years has focused on assessing the reliability of FC across younger subjects within and between scan-sessions. Test-retest reliability in resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) has not yet been examined in older adults. In this study, we investigated age-related differences in reliability and stability of RSFC across scans. In addition, we examined how global signal regression (GSR) affects RSFC reliability and stability. Three separate resting-state scans from 29 younger adults (18–35 yrs) and 26 older adults (55–85 yrs) were obtained from the International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM) dataset made publically available as part of the 1000 Functional Connectomes project www.nitrc.org/projects/fcon_1000. 92 regions of interest (ROIs) with 5 cubic mm radius, derived from the default, cingulo-opercular, fronto-parietal and sensorimotor networks, were previously defined based on a recent study. Mean time series were extracted from each of the 92 ROIs from each scan and three matrices of z-transformed correlation coefficients were created for each subject, which were then used for evaluation of multi-scan reliability and stability. The young group showed higher reliability of RSFC than the old group with GSR (p-value = 0.028) and without GSR (p-value
Suggested Citation
Jie Song & Alok S Desphande & Timothy B Meier & Dana L Tudorascu & Svyatoslav Vergun & Veena A Nair & Bharat B Biswal & Mary E Meyerand & Rasmus M Birn & Pierre Bellec & Vivek Prabhakaran, 2012.
"Age-Related Differences in Test-Retest Reliability in Resting-State Brain Functional Connectivity,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-16, December.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0049847
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049847
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0049847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.