IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0047806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Formal Representation of the WHO and UNICEF Estimates of National Immunization Coverage: A Computational Logic Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony Burton
  • Robert Kowalski
  • Marta Gacic-Dobo
  • Rouslan Karimov
  • David Brown

Abstract

Production of official statistics frequently requires expert judgement to evaluate and reconcile data of unknown and varying quality from multiple and potentially conflicting sources. Moreover, exceptional events may be difficult to incorporate in modelled estimates. Computational logic provides a methodology and tools for incorporating analyst's judgement, integrating multiple data sources and modelling methods, ensuring transparency and replicability, and making documentation computationally accessible. Representations using computational logic can be implemented in a variety of computer-based languages for automated production. Computational logic complements standard mathematical and statistical techniques and extends the flexibility of mathematical and statistical modelling. A basic overview of computational logic is presented and its application to official statistics is illustrated with the WHO & UNICEF estimates of national immunization coverage.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony Burton & Robert Kowalski & Marta Gacic-Dobo & Rouslan Karimov & David Brown, 2012. "A Formal Representation of the WHO and UNICEF Estimates of National Immunization Coverage: A Computational Logic Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0047806
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0047806
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0047806&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0047806?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0047806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.