IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0046586.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Loud Auditory Stimulus Overcomes Voluntary Movement Limitation in Cervical Dystonia

Author

Listed:
  • Tereza Serranová
  • Robert Jech
  • Maria José Martí
  • Raluca Modreanu
  • Francesc Valldeoriola
  • Tomáš Sieger
  • Evžen Růžička
  • Josep Valls-Solé

Abstract

Background: Patients with cervical dystonia (CD) present with an impaired performance of voluntary neck movements, which are usually slow and limited. We hypothesized that such abnormality could involve defective preparation for task execution. Therefore, we examined motor preparation in CD patients using the StartReact method. In this test, a startling auditory stimulus (SAS) is delivered unexpectedly at the time of the imperative signal (IS) in a reaction time task to cause a faster execution of the prepared motor programme. We expected that CD patients would show an abnormal StartReact phenomenon. Methods: Fifteen CD patients and 15 age matched control subjects (CS) were asked to perform a rotational movement (RM) to either side as quick as possible immediately after IS perception (a low intensity electrical stimulus to the II finger). In randomly interspersed test trials (25%) a 130 dB SAS was delivered simultaneously with the IS. We recorded RMs in the horizontal plane with a high speed video camera (2.38 ms per frame) in synchronization with the IS. The RM kinematic-parameters (latency, velocity, duration and amplitude) were analyzed using video-editing software and screen protractor. Patients were asked to rate the difficulty of their RMs in a numerical rating scale. Results: In control trials, CD patients executed slower RMs (repeated measures ANOVA, p

Suggested Citation

  • Tereza Serranová & Robert Jech & Maria José Martí & Raluca Modreanu & Francesc Valldeoriola & Tomáš Sieger & Evžen Růžička & Josep Valls-Solé, 2012. "A Loud Auditory Stimulus Overcomes Voluntary Movement Limitation in Cervical Dystonia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-9, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0046586
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046586
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0046586
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0046586&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0046586?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0046586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.