IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0045409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Disease Activity in SPMS and PPMS in the Context of Multicenter Clinical Trials

Author

Listed:
  • Rotem Orbach
  • Zhenming Zhao
  • Yong-Cheng Wang
  • Gilmore O’Neill
  • Diego Cadavid

Abstract

Background: Retrospective single center natural history studies have shown that times to reach disability milestones and ages at which they are reached are similar in primary (PPMS) and secondary (SPMS) progressive multiple sclerosis suggesting that they may be phenotypic variations of the same disease. Objective: Here we compared longitudinal disease activity in SPMS and PPMS in the context of international multicenter clinical trials. Methods: We analyzed all objective outcome measures that were systematically collected over 2 years for all subjects randomized to placebo arms in one SPMS and one PPMS clinical trial over the last decade. Conventional and exploratory definitions of clinical disease activity were used. Disease activity was analyzed in 3 different categories intermittent activity, progression, and improvement. Conventional MRI measures and one patient reported outcome measure of quality of life were included when available for comparison. Heat maps were drawn for all results followed by hierarchical clustering. Results: There were 101 outcome variables from 206 SPMS subjects and 79 outcome variables from 135 PPMS subjects. The comparison revealed that SPMS and PPMS subjects exhibited similar disease activity over 2 years in all but two of the variables in common worsening in the EDSS sensory system was more common in PPMS while worsening on the 9 hole PEG was more common in SPMS. Intermittent activity was the most common pattern of disease activity in SPMS and PPMS. Clinical worsening and improvement occurred at similar frequency in both. Conclusion: Longitudinal disease activity was nearly identical in SPMS and PPMS subjects in the context of the two multicenter international clinical trials we examined.

Suggested Citation

  • Rotem Orbach & Zhenming Zhao & Yong-Cheng Wang & Gilmore O’Neill & Diego Cadavid, 2012. "Comparison of Disease Activity in SPMS and PPMS in the Context of Multicenter Clinical Trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-10, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0045409
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045409
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045409&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0045409?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert W Motl & Norman Putzki & Lara A Pilutti & Diego Cadavid, 2015. "Longitudinal Changes in Self-Reported Walking Ability in Multiple Sclerosis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0045409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.