IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0044930.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance of Transient Elastography for the Staging of Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: A Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Young Eun Chon
  • Eun Hee Choi
  • Ki Jun Song
  • Jun Yong Park
  • Do Young Kim
  • Kwang-Hyub Han
  • Chae Yoon Chon
  • Sang Hoon Ahn
  • Seung Up Kim

Abstract

Background: Transient elastography (TE), a non-invasive tool that measures liver stiffness, has been evaluated in meta-analyses for effectiveness in assessing liver fibrosis in European populations with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). However, these data cannot be extrapolated to populations in Asian countries, where chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is more prevalent. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the overall performance of TE for assessing liver fibrosis in patients with CHB. Methods: Studies from the literature and international conference abstracts which enrolled only patients with CHB or performed a subgroup analysis of such patients were enrolled. Combined effects were calculated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) and diagnostic accuracy values of each study. Result: A total of 18 studies comprising 2,772 patients were analyzed. The mean AUROCs for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (F2), severe fibrosis (F3), and cirrhosis (F4) were 0.859 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.857–0.860), 0.887 (95% CI, 0.886–0.887), and 0.929 (95% CI, 0.928–0.929), respectively. The estimated cutoff for F2 was 7.9 (range, 6.1–11.8) kPa, with a sensitivity of 74.3% and specificity of 78.3%. For F3, the cutoff value was determined to be 8.8 (range, 8.1–9.7) kPa, with a sensitivity of 74.0% and specificity of 63.8%. The cutoff value for F4 was 11.7 (range, 7.3–17.5) kPa, with a sensitivity of 84.6% and specificity of 81.5%. Conclusion: TE can be performed with good diagnostic accuracy for quantifying liver fibrosis in patients with CHB.

Suggested Citation

  • Young Eun Chon & Eun Hee Choi & Ki Jun Song & Jun Yong Park & Do Young Kim & Kwang-Hyub Han & Chae Yoon Chon & Sang Hoon Ahn & Seung Up Kim, 2012. "Performance of Transient Elastography for the Staging of Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-7, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0044930
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0044930
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0044930&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0044930?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huanming Xiao & Meijie Shi & Yubao Xie & Xiaoling Chi, 2017. "Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and Fibroscan for detecting liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Huisuo Hong & Jia Li & Yin Jin & Qiao Li & Weimin Li & Jiansheng Wu & Zhiming Huang, 2014. "Performance of Real-Time Elastography for the Staging of Hepatic Fibrosis: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Zitong Huang & Jingjing Huang & Tianran Zhou & Hongying Cao & Bo Tan, 2018. "Prognostic value of liver stiffness measurement for the liver-related surgical outcomes of patients under hepatic resection: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0044930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.