IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0043910.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety and Tolerability of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 and Effects on Biomarkers in Healthy Adults: Results from a Randomized Masked Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Nisha Mangalat
  • Yuying Liu
  • Nicole Y Fatheree
  • Michael J Ferris
  • Melissa R Van Arsdall
  • Zhongxue Chen
  • Mohammad H Rahbar
  • Wallace A Gleason
  • Johana Norori
  • Dat Q Tran
  • J Marc Rhoads

Abstract

Background: There are few carefully-designed studies investigating the safety of individual probiotics approved under Investigational New Drug policies. Objectives: The primary aim of this prospective, double-blind placebo-controlled trial was to investigate if daily treatment of adults with Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 (LR) for 2 months is safe and well-tolerated. Our secondary aim was to determine if LR treatment has immune effects as determined by regulatory T cell percentages, expression of toll-like receptors (TLR)-2 and −4 on circulating peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PMBCs), cytokine expression by stimulated PBMC, and intestinal inflammation as measured by fecal calprotectin. Methods: Forty healthy adults were randomized to a daily dose of 5×108 CFUs of LR (n = 30) or placebo (n = 10) for 2 months. Participants completed a daily diary card and had 7 clinic visits during treatment and observation. Results: There were no severe adverse events (SAEs) and no significant differences in adverse events (AEs). There were no differences in PBMC subclasses, TLRs, or cytokine expression after treatment. The probiotic-treated group had a significantly higher fecal calprotectin level than the placebo group after 2 months of treatment: 50 µg/g (IQR 24–127 µg/g) vs. 17 µg/g (IQR 11–26 µg/g), p = 0.03, although values remained in the normal clinical range (0–162.9 µg/g). LR vials retained >108 CFUs viable organisms/ml. Conclusions: LR is safe and well tolerated in adults, without significant changes in immunologic markers. There was a small but significant increase in fecal calprotectin, perhaps indicating some element of immune recognition at the intestinal level. Trial Registration: Clinical Trials.gov NCT00922727

Suggested Citation

  • Nisha Mangalat & Yuying Liu & Nicole Y Fatheree & Michael J Ferris & Melissa R Van Arsdall & Zhongxue Chen & Mohammad H Rahbar & Wallace A Gleason & Johana Norori & Dat Q Tran & J Marc Rhoads, 2012. "Safety and Tolerability of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 and Effects on Biomarkers in Healthy Adults: Results from a Randomized Masked Trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0043910
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0043910
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0043910&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0043910?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patricia L Hibberd & Lauren Kleimola & Anne-Maria Fiorino & Christine Botelho & Miriam Haverkamp & Irina Andreyeva & Debra Poutsiaka & Claire Fraser & Gloria Solano-Aguilar & David R Snydman, 2014. "No Evidence of Harms of Probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG ATCC 53103 in Healthy Elderly—A Phase I Open Label Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability and Cytokine Responses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0043910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.