IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0039749.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Crowd-Powered Search Groups: A Social Network Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Qingpeng Zhang
  • Fei-Yue Wang
  • Daniel Zeng
  • Tao Wang

Abstract

Background: Crowd-powered search is a new form of search and problem solving scheme that involves collaboration among a potentially large number of voluntary Web users. Human flesh search (HFS), a particular form of crowd-powered search originated in China, has seen tremendous growth since its inception in 2001. HFS presents a valuable test-bed for scientists to validate existing and new theories in social computing, sociology, behavioral sciences, and so forth. Methodology: In this research, we construct an aggregated HFS group, consisting of the participants and their relationships in a comprehensive set of identified HFS episodes. We study the topological properties and the evolution of the aggregated network and different sub-groups in the network. We also identify the key HFS participants according to a variety of measures. Conclusions: We found that, as compared with other online social networks, HFS participant network shares the power-law degree distribution and small-world property, but with a looser and more distributed organizational structure, leading to the diversity, decentralization, and independence of HFS participants. In addition, the HFS group has been becoming increasingly decentralized. The comparisons of different HFS sub-groups reveal that HFS participants collaborated more often when they conducted the searches in local platforms or the searches requiring a certain level of professional knowledge background. On the contrary, HFS participants did not collaborate much when they performed the search task in national platforms or the searches with general topics that did not require specific information and learning. We also observed that the key HFS information contributors, carriers, and transmitters came from different groups of HFS participants.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingpeng Zhang & Fei-Yue Wang & Daniel Zeng & Tao Wang, 2012. "Understanding Crowd-Powered Search Groups: A Social Network Perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0039749
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0039749
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0039749&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0039749?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhu, Hou & Hu, Bin, 2017. "Agent based simulation on the process of human flesh search—From perspective of knowledge and emotion," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 469(C), pages 71-80.
    2. Michal Zilincik & Pavol Navrat & Gabriela Koskova, 2013. "Exploratory Search on Twitter Utilizing User Feedback and Multi-Perspective Microblog Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-9, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0039749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.