IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0039530.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

HIV Testing in Non-Traditional Settings – The HINTS Study: A Multi-Centre Observational Study of Feasibility and Acceptability

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Rayment
  • Alicia Thornton
  • Sundhiya Mandalia
  • Gillian Elam
  • Mark Atkins
  • Rachael Jones
  • Anthony Nardone
  • Patrick Roberts
  • Melinda Tenant-Flowers
  • Jane Anderson
  • Ann K. Sullivan on behalf of the HINTS Study Group

Abstract

Background: UK guidelines recommend routine HIV testing in healthcare settings if the local diagnosed HIV prevalence >2/1000 persons. This prospective study assessed the feasibility and acceptability, to patients and staff, of routinely offering HIV tests in four settings: Emergency Department, Acute Care Unit, Dermatology Outpatients and Primary Care. Modelling suggested the estimated prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infection in attendees would exceed 1/1000 persons. The prevalence identified prospectively was not a primary outcome. Methods: Permanent staff completed questionnaires assessing attitudes towards routine HIV testing in their workplace before testing began. Subsequently, over a three-month period, patients aged 16–65 were offered an HIV test by study staff. Demographics, uptake, results, and departmental activity were collected. Subsets of patients completed questionnaires. Analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with test uptake. Findings: Questionnaires were received from 144 staff. 96% supported the expansion of HIV testing, but only 54% stated that they would feel comfortable delivering testing themselves, with 72% identifying a need for training. Of 6194 patients offered a test, 4105 (66·8%) accepted (61·8–75·4% across sites). Eight individuals were diagnosed with HIV (0–10/1000 across sites) and all transferred to care. Younger people, and males, were more likely to accept an HIV test. No significant associations were found between uptake and ethnicity, or clinical site. Questionnaires were returned from 1003 patients. The offer of an HIV test was acceptable to 92%. Of respondents, individuals who had never tested for HIV before were more likely to accept a test, but no association was found between test uptake and sexual orientation. Conclusions: HIV testing in these settings is acceptable, and operationally feasible. The strategy successfully identified, and transferred to care, HIV-positive individuals. However, if HIV testing is to be included as a routine part of patients’ care, additional staff training and infrastructural resources will be required.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Rayment & Alicia Thornton & Sundhiya Mandalia & Gillian Elam & Mark Atkins & Rachael Jones & Anthony Nardone & Patrick Roberts & Melinda Tenant-Flowers & Jane Anderson & Ann K. Sullivan on beh, 2012. "HIV Testing in Non-Traditional Settings – The HINTS Study: A Multi-Centre Observational Study of Feasibility and Acceptability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-9, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0039530
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0039530
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0039530&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0039530?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weinhardt, L.S. & Carey, M.P. & Johnson, B.T. & Bickham, N.L., 1999. "Effects of HIV counseling and testing on sexual risk behavior: A meta- analytic review of published research, 1985-1997," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 89(9), pages 1397-1405.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Áureo De Paula & Gil Shapira & Petra E. Todd, 2014. "How Beliefs About Hiv Status Affect Risky Behaviors: Evidence From Malawi," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(6), pages 944-964, September.
    2. Peltzer, Karl & Tabane, Cily & Matseke, Gladys & Simbayi, Leickness, 2010. "Lay counsellor-based risk reduction intervention with HIV positive diagnosed patients at public HIV counselling and testing sites in Mpumalanga, South Africa," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 379-385, November.
    3. Ruben Castro & Jere Behrman & Hans-Peter Kohler, 2015. "Perception of HIV risk and the quantity and quality of children: the case of rural Malawi," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 28(1), pages 113-132, January.
    4. Neeraj Sood & Yanyu Wu, 2013. "The Impact of Insurance and HIV Treatment Technology on HIV Testing," NBER Working Papers 19397, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Emily Oster & Ira Shoulson & E. Ray Dorsey, 2013. "Optimal Expectations and Limited Medical Testing: Evidence from Huntington Disease," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(2), pages 804-830, April.
    6. Baird, Sarah & Gong, Erick & McIntosh, Craig & Özler, Berk, 2014. "The heterogeneous effects of HIV testing," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 98-112.
    7. Peter Glick, 2005. "Scaling Up HIV Voluntary Counseling and Testing in Africa," Evaluation Review, , vol. 29(4), pages 331-357, August.
    8. Adeline Delavande & Hans-Peter Kohler, 2012. "The Impact of HIV Testing on Subjective Expectations and Risky Behavior in Malawi," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 49(3), pages 1011-1036, August.
    9. Schünemann, Johannes & Strulik, Holger & Trimborn, Timo, 2023. "Anticipation of deteriorating health and information avoidance," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    10. Anthony Chukwuma Nwali & Rev. Sister Clementina Kalu & Chimeziem Chimdiadi Udeze & Iroegbu Ngozi Franca & Chinazor Franca Obi & Nicholas Ihentuge Achilike, 2020. "Behavioural and Socio-economic Implications of HIV/AIDS Patients on Population and Development of Ebonyi State, Nigeria: 2010–2014," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(6), pages 106-106, May.
    11. Oon Tek Ng & Angela L Chow & Vernon J Lee & Mark I C Chen & Mar Kyaw Win & Hiok Hee Tan & Arlene Chua & Yee Sin Leo, 2012. "Accuracy and User-Acceptability of HIV Self-Testing Using an Oral Fluid-Based HIV Rapid Test," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-8, September.
    12. Kumar, Manoj & Birch, Stephen & Maturana, Andres & Gafni, Amiran, 2006. "Economic evaluation of HIV screening in pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in India," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(2), pages 233-243, July.
    13. Portnoy, David B., 2010. "Waiting is the hardest part: Anticipating medical test results affects processing and recall of important information," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 421-428, July.
    14. Anthony T. Carter, 2008. "Creative providers: Counseling and counselors in family planning and reproductive health," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 19(59), pages 1969-2010.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0039530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.