IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0035689.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Metastases from Metastases Clinical Relevant? Computer Modelling of Cancer Spread in a Case of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Author

Listed:
  • Anja Bethge
  • Udo Schumacher
  • Andreas Wree
  • Gero Wedemann

Abstract

Background: Metastasis formation remains an enigmatic process and one of the main questions recently asked is whether metastases are able to generate further metastases. Different models have been proposed to answer this question; however, their clinical significance remains unclear. Therefore a computer model was developed that permits comparison of the different models quantitatively with clinical data and that additionally predicts the outcome of treatment interventions. Methods: The computer model is based on discrete events simulation approach. On the basis of a case from an untreated patient with hepatocellular carcinoma and its multiple metastases in the liver, it was evaluated whether metastases are able to metastasise and in particular if late disseminated tumour cells are still capable to form metastases. Additionally, the resection of the primary tumour was simulated. The simulation results were compared with clinical data. Results: The simulation results reveal that the number of metastases varies significantly between scenarios where metastases metastasise and scenarios where they do not. In contrast, the total tumour mass is nearly unaffected by the two different modes of metastasis formation. Furthermore, the results provide evidence that metastasis formation is an early event and that late disseminated tumour cells are still capable of forming metastases. Simulations also allow estimating how the resection of the primary tumour delays the patient's death. Conclusion: The simulation results indicate that for this particular case of a hepatocellular carcinoma late metastases, i.e., metastases from metastases, are irrelevant in terms of total tumour mass. Hence metastases seeded from metastases are clinically irrelevant in our model system. Only the first metastases seeded from the primary tumour contribute significantly to the tumour burden and thus cause the patient's death.

Suggested Citation

  • Anja Bethge & Udo Schumacher & Andreas Wree & Gero Wedemann, 2012. "Are Metastases from Metastases Clinical Relevant? Computer Modelling of Cancer Spread in a Case of Hepatocellular Carcinoma," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-12, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0035689
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035689
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0035689
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0035689&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0035689?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter J. Campbell & Shinichi Yachida & Laura J. Mudie & Philip J. Stephens & Erin D. Pleasance & Lucy A. Stebbings & Laura A. Morsberger & Calli Latimer & Stuart McLaren & Meng-Lay Lin & David J. McBr, 2010. "The patterns and dynamics of genomic instability in metastatic pancreatic cancer," Nature, Nature, vol. 467(7319), pages 1109-1113, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng H Lee & Benjamin O Alpert & Preethi Sankaranarayanan & Orly Alter, 2012. "GSVD Comparison of Patient-Matched Normal and Tumor aCGH Profiles Reveals Global Copy-Number Alterations Predicting Glioblastoma Multiforme Survival," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-11, January.
    2. Sanjay M. Prakadan & Christopher A. Alvarez-Breckenridge & Samuel C. Markson & Albert E. Kim & Robert H. Klein & Naema Nayyar & Andrew W. Navia & Benjamin M. Kuter & Kellie E. Kolb & Ivanna Bihun & Jo, 2021. "Genomic and transcriptomic correlates of immunotherapy response within the tumor microenvironment of leptomeningeal metastases," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Roland F Schwarz & Anne Trinh & Botond Sipos & James D Brenton & Nick Goldman & Florian Markowetz, 2014. "Phylogenetic Quantification of Intra-tumour Heterogeneity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-11, April.
    4. Amr M. Al-Zain & Mattie R. Nester & Iffat Ahmed & Lorraine S. Symington, 2023. "Double-strand breaks induce inverted duplication chromosome rearrangements by a DNA polymerase δ-dependent mechanism," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Mihoko Saito-Adachi & Natsuko Hama & Yasushi Totoki & Hiromi Nakamura & Yasuhito Arai & Fumie Hosoda & Hirofumi Rokutan & Shinichi Yachida & Mamoru Kato & Akihiko Fukagawa & Tatsuhiro Shibata, 2023. "Oncogenic structural aberration landscape in gastric cancer genomes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Chaohui Li & Lingxi Chen & Guangze Pan & Wenqian Zhang & Shuai Cheng Li, 2023. "Deciphering complex breakage-fusion-bridge genome rearrangements with Ambigram," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Linda K Sundermann & Jeff Wintersinger & Gunnar Rätsch & Jens Stoye & Quaid Morris, 2021. "Reconstructing tumor evolutionary histories and clone trees in polynomial-time with SubMARine," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-28, January.
    8. Sun Young Lee & Farhan Haq & Deokhoon Kim & Cui Jun & Hui-Jong Jo & Sung-Min Ahn & Won-Suk Lee, 2014. "Comparative Genomic Analysis of Primary and Synchronous Metastatic Colorectal Cancers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-9, March.
    9. Bo Jiang & Xiaozhi Zhao & Wei Chen & Wenli Diao & Meng Ding & Haixiang Qin & Binghua Li & Wenmin Cao & Wei Chen & Yao Fu & Kuiqiang He & Jie Gao & Mengxia Chen & Tingsheng Lin & Yongming Deng & Chao Y, 2022. "Lysosomal protein transmembrane 5 promotes lung-specific metastasis by regulating BMPR1A lysosomal degradation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0035689. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.