IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0029332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Significance of African Lions for the Financial Viability of Trophy Hunting and the Maintenance of Wild Land

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Andrew Lindsey
  • Guy Andrew Balme
  • Vernon Richard Booth
  • Neil Midlane

Abstract

Recent studies indicate that trophy hunting is impacting negatively on some lion populations, notably in Tanzania. In 2004 there was a proposal to list lions on CITES Appendix I and in 2011 animal-welfare groups petitioned the United States government to list lions as endangered under their Endangered Species Act. Such listings would likely curtail the trophy hunting of lions by limiting the import of lion trophies. Concurrent efforts are underway to encourage the European Union to ban lion trophy imports. We assessed the significance of lions to the financial viability of trophy hunting across five countries to help determine the financial impact and advisability of the proposed trade restrictions. Lion hunts attract the highest mean prices (US$24,000–US$71,000) of all trophy species. Lions generate 5–17% of gross trophy hunting income on national levels, the proportional significance highest in Mozambique, Tanzania, and Zambia. If lion hunting was effectively precluded, trophy hunting could potentially become financially unviable across at least 59,538 km2 that could result in a concomitant loss of habitat. However, the loss of lion hunting could have other potentially broader negative impacts including reduction of competitiveness of wildlife-based land uses relative to ecologically unfavourable alternatives. Restrictions on lion hunting may also reduce tolerance for the species among communities where local people benefit from trophy hunting, and may reduce funds available for anti-poaching. If lion off-takes were reduced to recommended maximums (0.5/1000 km2), the loss of viability and reduction in profitability would be much lower than if lion hunting was stopped altogether (7,005 km2). We recommend that interventions focus on reducing off-takes to sustainable levels, implementing age-based regulations and improving governance of trophy hunting. Such measures could ensure sustainability, while retaining incentives for the conservation of lions and their habitat from hunting.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Andrew Lindsey & Guy Andrew Balme & Vernon Richard Booth & Neil Midlane, 2012. "The Significance of African Lions for the Financial Viability of Trophy Hunting and the Maintenance of Wild Land," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0029332
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0029332
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0029332&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0029332?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul J Funston & Rosemary J Groom & Peter A Lindsey, 2013. "Insights into the Management of Large Carnivores for Profitable Wildlife-Based Land Uses in African Savannas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-8, March.
    2. Vivienne L Williams & Andrew J Loveridge & David J Newton & David W Macdonald, 2017. "Questionnaire survey of the pan-African trade in lion body parts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-35, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0029332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.