IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0027518.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which Compound to Select in Lead Optimization? Prospectively Validated Proteochemometric Models Guide Preclinical Development

Author

Listed:
  • Gerard J P van Westen
  • Jörg K Wegner
  • Peggy Geluykens
  • Leen Kwanten
  • Inge Vereycken
  • Anik Peeters
  • Adriaan P IJzerman
  • Herman W T van Vlijmen
  • Andreas Bender

Abstract

In quite a few diseases, drug resistance due to target variability poses a serious problem in pharmacotherapy. This is certainly true for HIV, and hence, it is often unknown which drug is best to use or to develop against an individual HIV strain. In this work we applied ‘proteochemometric’ modeling of HIV Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase (NNRTI) inhibitors to support preclinical development by predicting compound performance on multiple mutants in the lead selection stage. Proteochemometric models are based on both small molecule and target properties and can thus capture multi-target activity relationships simultaneously, the targets in this case being a set of 14 HIV Reverse Transcriptase (RT) mutants. We validated our model by experimentally confirming model predictions for 317 untested compound – mutant pairs, with a prediction error comparable with assay variability (RMSE 0.62). Furthermore, dependent on the similarity of a new mutant to the training set, we could predict with high accuracy which compound will be most effective on a sequence with a previously unknown genotype. Hence, our models allow the evaluation of compound performance on untested sequences and the selection of the most promising leads for further preclinical research. The modeling concept is likely to be applicable also to other target families with genetic variability like other viruses or bacteria, or with similar orthologs like GPCRs.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerard J P van Westen & Jörg K Wegner & Peggy Geluykens & Leen Kwanten & Inge Vereycken & Anik Peeters & Adriaan P IJzerman & Herman W T van Vlijmen & Andreas Bender, 2011. "Which Compound to Select in Lead Optimization? Prospectively Validated Proteochemometric Models Guide Preclinical Development," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-13, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0027518
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0027518
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0027518&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0027518?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gerard J P van Westen & Alwin Hendriks & Jörg K Wegner & Adriaan P IJzerman & Herman W T van Vlijmen & Andreas Bender, 2013. "Significantly Improved HIV Inhibitor Efficacy Prediction Employing Proteochemometric Models Generated From Antivirogram Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Dong-Sheng Cao & Yi-Zeng Liang & Zhe Deng & Qian-Nan Hu & Min He & Qing-Song Xu & Guang-Hua Zhou & Liu-Xia Zhang & Zi-xin Deng & Shao Liu, 2013. "Genome-Scale Screening of Drug-Target Associations Relevant to Ki Using a Chemogenomics Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0027518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.