IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0027130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Epidemiological Reappraisal of the Familial Aggregation of Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Michał Kiciński
  • Jaco Vangronsveld
  • Tim S Nawrot

Abstract

Studies on familial aggregation of cancer may suggest an overall contribution of inherited genes or a shared environment in the development of malignant disease. We performed a meta-analysis on familial clustering of prostate cancer. Out of 74 studies reporting data on familial aggregation of prostate cancer in unselected populations retrieved by a Pubmed search and browsing references, 33 independent studies meeting the inclusion criteria were used in the analysis performed with the random effects model. The pooled rate ratio (RR) for first-degree family history, i.e. affected father or brother, is 2.48 (95% confidence interval: 2.25–2.74). The incidence rate for men who have a brother who got prostate cancer increases 3.14 times (CI:2.37–4.15), and for those with affected father 2.35 times (CI:2.02–2.72). The pooled estimate of RR for two or more affected first-degree family members relative to no history in father and in brother is 4.39 (CI:2.61–7.39). First-degree family history appears to increase the incidence rate of prostate cancer more in men under 65 (RR:2.87, CI:2.21–3.74), than in men aged 65 and older (RR:1.92, CI:1.49–2.47), p for interaction = 0.002. The attributable fraction among those having an affected first-degree relative equals to 59.7% (CI:55.6–63.5%) for men at all ages, 65.2% (CI:57.7–71.4%) for men younger than 65 and 47.9% (CI:37.1–56.8%) for men aged 65 or older. For those with a family history in 2 or more first-degree family members 77.2% (CI:65.4–85.0%) of prostate cancer incidence can be attributed to the familial clustering. Our combined estimates show strong familial clustering and a significant effect-modification by age meaning that familial aggregation was associated with earlier disease onset (before age 65).

Suggested Citation

  • Michał Kiciński & Jaco Vangronsveld & Tim S Nawrot, 2011. "An Epidemiological Reappraisal of the Familial Aggregation of Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-7, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0027130
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0027130
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0027130&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0027130?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shannon M Lynch & Elizabeth Handorf & Kristen A Sorice & Elizabeth Blackman & Lisa Bealin & Veda N Giri & Elias Obeid & Camille Ragin & Mary Daly, 2020. "The effect of neighborhood social environment on prostate cancer development in black and white men at high risk for prostate cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Takahide Hayano & Hiroshi Matsui & Hirofumi Nakaoka & Nobuaki Ohtake & Kazuyoshi Hosomichi & Kazuhiro Suzuki & Ituro Inoue, 2016. "Germline Variants of Prostate Cancer in Japanese Families," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0027130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.