IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0023441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of Mortality in Very Premature Infants: A Systematic Review of Prediction Models

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie Medlock
  • Anita C J Ravelli
  • Pieter Tamminga
  • Ben W M Mol
  • Ameen Abu-Hanna

Abstract

Context: Being born very preterm is associated with elevated risk for neonatal mortality. The aim of this review is to give an overview of prediction models for mortality in very premature infants, assess their quality, identify important predictor variables, and provide recommendations for development of future models. Methods: Studies were included which reported the predictive performance of a model for mortality in a very preterm or very low birth weight population, and classified as development, validation, or impact studies. For each development study, we recorded the population, variables, aim, predictive performance of the model, and the number of times each model had been validated. Reporting quality criteria and minimum methodological criteria were established and assessed for development studies. Results: We identified 41 development studies and 18 validation studies. In addition to gestational age and birth weight, eight variables frequently predicted survival: being of average size for gestational age, female gender, non-white ethnicity, absence of serious congenital malformations, use of antenatal steroids, higher 5-minute Apgar score, normal temperature on admission, and better respiratory status. Twelve studies met our methodological criteria, three of which have been externally validated. Low reporting scores were seen in reporting of performance measures, internal and external validation, and handling of missing data. Conclusions: Multivariate models can predict mortality better than birth weight or gestational age alone in very preterm infants. There are validated prediction models for classification and case-mix adjustment. Additional research is needed in validation and impact studies of existing models, and in prediction of mortality in the clinically important subgroup of infants where age and weight alone give only an equivocal prognosis.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie Medlock & Anita C J Ravelli & Pieter Tamminga & Ben W M Mol & Ameen Abu-Hanna, 2011. "Prediction of Mortality in Very Premature Infants: A Systematic Review of Prediction Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-9, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0023441
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023441
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0023441
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0023441&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0023441?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Samuel Watson & Wiji Arulampalam & Stavros Petrou & on behalf of NESCOP, 2017. "The effect of health care expenditure on patient outcomes: Evidence from English neonatal care," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(12), pages 274-284, December.
    2. Martín Iriondo & Marta Thio & Ruth del Río & Benjamin J Baucells & Mattia Bosio & Josep Figueras-Aloy, 2020. "Prediction of mortality in very low birth weight neonates in Spain," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Kama A Wlodzimirow & Saeid Eslami & Robert A F M Chamuleau & Martin Nieuwoudt & Ameen Abu-Hanna, 2012. "Prediction of Poor Outcome in Patients with Acute Liver Failure—Systematic Review of Prediction Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-7, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0023441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.