IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0015280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Restricted Attentional Capacity within but Not between Sensory Modalities: An Individual Differences Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Sander Martens
  • Manasa Kandula
  • John Duncan

Abstract

Background: Most people show a remarkable deficit to report the second of two targets when presented in close temporal succession, reflecting an attentional blink (AB). An aspect of the AB that is often ignored is that there are large individual differences in the magnitude of the effect. Here we exploit these individual differences to address a long-standing question: does attention to a visual target come at a cost for attention to an auditory target (and vice versa)? More specifically, the goal of the current study was to investigate a) whether individuals with a large within-modality AB also show a large cross-modal AB, and b) whether individual differences in AB magnitude within different modalities correlate or are completely separate. Methodology/Principal Findings: While minimizing differential task difficulty and chances for a task-switch to occur, a significant AB was observed when targets were both presented within the auditory or visual modality, and a positive correlation was found between individual within-modality AB magnitudes. However, neither a cross-modal AB nor a correlation between cross-modal and within-modality AB magnitudes was found. Conclusion/Significance: The results provide strong evidence that a major source of attentional restriction must lie in modality-specific sensory systems rather than a central amodal system, effectively settling a long-standing debate. Individuals with a large within-modality AB may be especially committed or focused in their processing of the first target, and to some extent that tendency to focus could cross modalities, reflected in the within-modality correlation. However, what they are focusing (resource allocation, blocking of processing) is strictly within-modality as it only affects the second target on within-modality trials. The findings show that individual differences in AB magnitude can provide important information about the modular structure of human cognition.

Suggested Citation

  • Sander Martens & Manasa Kandula & John Duncan, 2010. "Restricted Attentional Capacity within but Not between Sensory Modalities: An Individual Differences Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-6, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0015280
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0015280
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0015280&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0015280?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Duncan & Sander Martens & Robert Ward, 1997. "Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities," Nature, Nature, vol. 387(6635), pages 808-810, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janne F Ettwig & Adelbert W Bronkhorst, 2015. "Attentional Switches and Dual-Task Interference," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Jacob Taylor Fisher & Frederic René Hopp & René Weber, 2019. "Modality-Specific Effects of Perceptual Load in Multimedia Processing," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 149-165.
    3. Hong-Wen Cao & Kai-Bin Jin & Chao-Yi Li & Hong-Mei Yan, 2014. "Attentional Blink Is Hierarchically Modulated by Phonological, Morphological, Semantic and Lexical Connections between Two Chinese Characters," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-6, August.
    4. Anna Peng & Natasha Z Kirkham & Denis Mareschal, 2018. "Information processes of task-switching and modality-shifting across development," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Troy A W Visser & Jeneva L Ohan, 2012. "How Does Information Processing Speed Relate to the Attentional Blink?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-8, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0015280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.