IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0013624.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial Neural Networks in the Outcome Prediction of Adjustable Gastric Banding in Obese Women

Author

Listed:
  • Paolo Piaggi
  • Chita Lippi
  • Paola Fierabracci
  • Margherita Maffei
  • Alba Calderone
  • Mauro Mauri
  • Marco Anselmino
  • Giovanni Battista Cassano
  • Paolo Vitti
  • Aldo Pinchera
  • Alberto Landi
  • Ferruccio Santini

Abstract

Background: Obesity is unanimously regarded as a global epidemic and a major contributing factor to the development of many common illnesses. Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB) is one of the most popular surgical approaches worldwide. Yet, substantial variability in the results and significant rate of failure can be expected, and it is still debated which categories of patients are better suited to this type of bariatric procedure. The aim of this study was to build a statistical model based on both psychological and physical data to predict weight loss in obese patients treated by LAGB, and to provide a valuable instrument for the selection of patients that may benefit from this procedure. Methodology/Principal Findings: The study population consisted of 172 obese women, with a mean±SD presurgical and postsurgical Body Mass Index (BMI) of 42.5±5.1 and 32.4±4.8 kg/m2, respectively. Subjects were administered the comprehensive test of psychopathology Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). Main goal of the study was to use presurgical data to predict individual therapeutical outcome in terms of Excess Weight Loss (EWL) after 2 years. Multiple linear regression analysis using the MMPI-2 scores, BMI and age was performed to determine the variables that best predicted the EWL. Based on the selected variables including age, and 3 psychometric scales, Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) were employed to improve the goodness of prediction. Linear and non linear models were compared in their classification and prediction tasks: non linear model resulted to be better at data fitting (36% vs. 10% variance explained, respectively) and provided more reliable parameters for accuracy and mis-classification rates (70% and 30% vs. 66% and 34%, respectively). Conclusions/Significance: ANN models can be successfully applied for prediction of weight loss in obese women treated by LAGB. This approach may constitute a valuable tool for selection of the best candidates for surgery, taking advantage of an integrated multidisciplinary approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Paolo Piaggi & Chita Lippi & Paola Fierabracci & Margherita Maffei & Alba Calderone & Mauro Mauri & Marco Anselmino & Giovanni Battista Cassano & Paolo Vitti & Aldo Pinchera & Alberto Landi & Ferrucci, 2010. "Artificial Neural Networks in the Outcome Prediction of Adjustable Gastric Banding in Obese Women," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0013624
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0013624
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0013624&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0013624?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hon-Yi Shi & Hao-Hsien Lee & Jinn-Tsong Tsai & Wen-Hsien Ho & Chieh-Fan Chen & King-Teh Lee & Chong-Chi Chiu, 2012. "Comparisons of Prediction Models of Quality of Life after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Longitudinal Prospective Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-8, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0013624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.