IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0013509.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quick Minds Slowed Down: Effects of Rotation and Stimulus Category on the Attentional Blink

Author

Listed:
  • Sander Martens
  • Ozlem Korucuoglu
  • Henderikus G O M Smid
  • Mark R Nieuwenstein

Abstract

Background: Most people show a remarkable deficit to report the second of two targets when presented in close temporal succession, reflecting an attentional restriction known as the ‘attentional blink’ (AB). However, there are large individual differences in the magnitude of the effect, with some people showing no such attentional restrictions. Methodology/Principal Findings: Here we present behavioral and electrophysiological evidence suggesting that these ‘non-blinkers’ can use alphanumeric category information to select targets at an early processing stage. When such information was unavailable and target selection could only be based on information that is processed relatively late (rotation), even non-blinkers show a substantial AB. Electrophysiologically, in non-blinkers this resulted in enhanced distractor-related prefrontal brain activity, as well as delayed target-related occipito-parietal activity (P3). Conclusion/Significance: These findings shed new light on possible strategic mechanisms that may underlie individual differences in AB magnitude and provide intriguing clues as to how temporal restrictions as reflected in the AB can be overcome.

Suggested Citation

  • Sander Martens & Ozlem Korucuoglu & Henderikus G O M Smid & Mark R Nieuwenstein, 2010. "Quick Minds Slowed Down: Effects of Rotation and Stimulus Category on the Attentional Blink," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0013509
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0013509
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0013509&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0013509?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefan M Wierda & Hedderik van Rijn & Niels A Taatgen & Sander Martens, 2010. "Distracting the Mind Improves Performance: An ERP Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-7, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0013509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.