IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0006456.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Random Nature of Genome Architecture: Predicting Open Reading Frame Distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Michael W McCoy
  • Andrew P Allen
  • James F Gillooly

Abstract

Background: A better understanding of the size and abundance of open reading frames (ORFS) in whole genomes may shed light on the factors that control genome complexity. Here we examine the statistical distributions of open reading frames (i.e. distribution of start and stop codons) in the fully sequenced genomes of 297 prokaryotes, and 14 eukaryotes. Methodology/Principal Findings: By fitting mixture models to data from whole genome sequences we show that the size-frequency distributions for ORFS are strikingly similar across prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes. Moreover, we show that i) a large fraction (60–80%) of ORF size-frequency distributions can be predicted a priori with a stochastic assembly model based on GC content, and that (ii) size-frequency distributions of the remaining “non-random” ORFs are well-fitted by log-normal or gamma distributions, and similar to the size distributions of annotated proteins. Conclusions/Significance: Our findings suggest stochastic processes have played a primary role in the evolution of genome complexity, and that common processes govern the conservation and loss of functional genomics units in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael W McCoy & Andrew P Allen & James F Gillooly, 2009. "The Random Nature of Genome Architecture: Predicting Open Reading Frame Distributions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(7), pages 1-8, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0006456
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0006456
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0006456&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0006456?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katharina Mir & Klaus Neuhaus & Siegfried Scherer & Martin Bossert & Steffen Schober, 2012. "Predicting Statistical Properties of Open Reading Frames in Bacterial Genomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-12, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0006456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.