IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0003899.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Computational Analysis and Experimental Validation of Gene Predictions in Toxoplasma gondii

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph M Dybas
  • Carlos J Madrid-Aliste
  • Fa-Yun Che
  • Edward Nieves
  • Dmitry Rykunov
  • Ruth Hogue Angeletti
  • Louis M Weiss
  • Kami Kim
  • Andras Fiser

Abstract

Background: Toxoplasma gondii is an obligate intracellular protozoan that infects 20 to 90% of the population. It can cause both acute and chronic infections, many of which are asymptomatic, and, in immunocompromized hosts, can cause fatal infection due to reactivation from an asymptomatic chronic infection. An essential step towards understanding molecular mechanisms controlling transitions between the various life stages and identifying candidate drug targets is to accurately characterize the T. gondii proteome. Methodology/Principal Findings: We have explored the proteome of T. gondii tachyzoites with high throughput proteomics experiments and by comparison to publicly available cDNA sequence data. Mass spectrometry analysis validated 2,477 gene coding regions with 6,438 possible alternative gene predictions; approximately one third of the T. gondii proteome. The proteomics survey identified 609 proteins that are unique to Toxoplasma as compared to any known species including other Apicomplexan. Computational analysis identified 787 cases of possible gene duplication events and located at least 6,089 gene coding regions. Commonly used gene prediction algorithms produce very disparate sets of protein sequences, with pairwise overlaps ranging from 1.4% to 12%. Through this experimental and computational exercise we benchmarked gene prediction methods and observed false negative rates of 31 to 43%. Conclusions/Significance: This study not only provides the largest proteomics exploration of the T. gondii proteome, but illustrates how high throughput proteomics experiments can elucidate correct gene structures in genomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph M Dybas & Carlos J Madrid-Aliste & Fa-Yun Che & Edward Nieves & Dmitry Rykunov & Ruth Hogue Angeletti & Louis M Weiss & Kami Kim & Andras Fiser, 2008. "Computational Analysis and Experimental Validation of Gene Predictions in Toxoplasma gondii," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(12), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0003899
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0003899
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0003899&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0003899?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samuel Karlin & Aviv Bergman & Andrew J. Gentles, 2001. "Annotation of the Drosophila genome," Nature, Nature, vol. 411(6835), pages 259-260, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0003899. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.