IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0009922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of the introduction of chikungunya and zika viruses on the incidence of dengue in endemic zones of Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Larissa Fernandes-Matano
  • Irma Eloisa Monroy-Muñoz
  • Hector Daniel Pardavé-Alejandre
  • Luis Antonio Uribe-Noguez
  • María de los Angeles Hernández-Cueto
  • Teresita Rojas-Mendoza
  • Clara Esperanza Santacruz-Tinoco
  • Concepción Grajales-Muñiz
  • José Esteban Muñoz-Medina

Abstract

Background: With the arrival of chikungunya (CHIKV) and zika (ZIKV) viruses in Mexico, there was a decrease in diagnosed dengue virus (DENV) cases. During the first years of cocirculation (2015–2017), the algorithms established by epidemiological surveillance systems and the installed capacity limited us to one diagnostic test per sample, so there was an underestimation of cases until September 2017, when a multiplex algorithm was implemented. Therefore, the objective of this study was determine the impact of the introduction of CHIKV and ZIKV on the incidence of diagnosed DENV in endemic areas of Mexico, when performing the rediagnosis, using the multiplex algorithm, in samples from the first three years of co-circulation of these arboviruses. Methodology and principal findings: For this, 1038 samples received by the Central Laboratory of Epidemiology between 2015 and 2017 were selected for this work. Viruses were identified by multiplex RT-qPCR, and the χ2 test was used to compare categorical variables. With the new multiplex algorithm, we identified 2.4 times the rate of arbovirosis as originally reported, evidencing an underestimation of the incidence of the three viruses. Even so, significantly less dengue was observed than in previous years. The high incidence rates of chikungunya and Zika coincided with periods of dengue decline. The endemic channel showed that the cases caused by DENV rose again after the circulation of CHIKV and ZIKV decreased. In addition, 23 cases of coinfection were identified, with combinations between all viruses. Conclusions and significance: The results obtained in this study show for the first time the real impact on the detected incidence of dengue after the introduction of CHIKV and ZIKV in Mexico, the degree of underestimation of these arboviruses in the country, as well as the co-infections between these viruses, whose importance clinical and epidemiological are still unknown. Author summary: Mexico is considered an endemic country for DENV as the number of cases each year is high. With the arrival of the CHIKV and ZIKV, this number decreased considerably. This led us to suspect that this decrease was not coincidental and could be attributed to two factors: the lack of expertise on the part of health teams to identify the clinical etiological agent and/or other complex ecological factors. Therefore, we decided to reanalyze 1038 suspected cases of dengue, chikungunya and Zika samples using a test that could identify any of the three viruses in a single reaction. We discovered that there was indeed an underestimation of cases, mostly of chikungunya and Zika but, contrary to what we imagined, a lower degree of dengue. We were also able to detect cases of coinfection, which had never been reported in Mexico. Thus, the present study lays the foundations for a better preparation for the arrival of other arboviruses, showing the need for the development and implementation of multiplex diagnostic techniques, in addition to providing more precise epidemiological information on this historical moment of co-circulation of these three arboviruses in our country.

Suggested Citation

  • Larissa Fernandes-Matano & Irma Eloisa Monroy-Muñoz & Hector Daniel Pardavé-Alejandre & Luis Antonio Uribe-Noguez & María de los Angeles Hernández-Cueto & Teresita Rojas-Mendoza & Clara Esperanza Sant, 2021. "Impact of the introduction of chikungunya and zika viruses on the incidence of dengue in endemic zones of Mexico," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0009922
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0009922
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0009922&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009922?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0009922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.