Author
Listed:
- Mohammad Al-Saeedi
- Ali Ramouz
- Elias Khajeh
- Ahmad El Rafidi
- Omid Ghamarnejad
- Saeed Shafiei
- Sadeq Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh
- Pascal Probst
- Marija Stojkovic
- Tim Frederik Weber
- Katrin Hoffmann
- Arianeb Mehrabi
Abstract
Background: In patients with hepatic cystic echinococcosis (CE), treatment effectiveness, outcomes, complications, and recurrence rate are controversial. Endocystectomy is a conservative surgical approach that adequately removes cyst contents without loss of parenchyma. This conservative procedure has been modified in several ways to prevent complications and to improve surgical outcomes. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the intraoperative and postoperative complications of endocysectomy for hepatic CE as well as the hepatic CE recurrence rate following endocystectomy. Methods: A systematic search was made for all studies reporting endocystectomy to manage hepatic CE in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Study quality was assessed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) criteria and the Cochrane revised tool to assess risk of bias in randomized trials (RoB2). The random-effects model was used for meta-analysis and the arscine-transformed proportions were used to determine complication-, mortality-, and recurrence rates. This study is registered with PROSPERO (number CRD42020181732). Results: Of 3,930 retrieved articles, 54 studies reporting on 4,058 patients were included. Among studies reporting preoperative anthelmintic treatment (31 studies), albendazole was administered in all of them. Complications were reported in 19.4% (95% CI: 15.9–23.2; I2 = 84%; p-value
Suggested Citation
Mohammad Al-Saeedi & Ali Ramouz & Elias Khajeh & Ahmad El Rafidi & Omid Ghamarnejad & Saeed Shafiei & Sadeq Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh & Pascal Probst & Marija Stojkovic & Tim Frederik Weber & Katrin Hoffmann, 2021.
"Endocystectomy as a conservative surgical treatment for hepatic cystic echinococcosis: A systematic review with single-arm meta-analysis,"
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, May.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pntd00:0009365
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009365
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0009365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.