IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0008917.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leprosy in a prison population: A new active search strategy and a prospective clinical analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Fred Bernardes Filho
  • Jaci Maria Santana
  • Regina Coeli Palma de Almeida
  • Glauber Voltan
  • Natália Aparecida de Paula
  • Marcel Nani Leite
  • Claudia Maria Lincoln Silva
  • Camila Tormena
  • Lean Basoli
  • Joelma Menezes
  • Moises Batista da Silva
  • John Stewart Spencer
  • Wilson Marques Jr
  • Norma Tiraboschi Foss
  • Marco Andrey Cipriani Frade

Abstract

Background: This study evaluates an active search strategy for leprosy diagnosis based on responses to a Leprosy Suspicion Questionnaire (LSQ), and analyzing the clinical, immunoepidemiological and follow-up aspects for individuals living in a prison population. Methods: A cross-sectional study based on a questionnaire posing 14 questions about leprosy symptoms and signs that was distributed to 1,400 prisoners. This was followed by dermatoneurological examination, anti-PGL-I serology and RLEP-PCR. Those without leprosy were placed in the Non-leprosy Group (NLG, n = 1,216) and those diagnosed with clinical symptoms of leprosy were placed in the Leprosy Group (LG, n = 34). Findings: In total, 896 LSQ were returned (64%), and 187 (20.9%) of the responses were deemed as positive for signs/symptoms, answering 2.7 questions on average. Clinically, 1,250 (89.3%) of the prisoners were evaluated resulting in the diagnosis of 34 new cases (LG), based on well-accepted clinical signs and symptoms, a new case detection rate of 2.7% within this population, while the NLG were comprised of 1,216 individuals. The confinement time medians were 39 months in the LG while it was 36 months in the NLG (p>0.05). The 31 leprosy cases who responded to the questionnaire (LSQ+) had an average of 1.5 responses. The symptoms “anesthetized skin area” and “pain in nerves” were most commonly mentioned in the LG while “tingling, numbness in the hands/feet”, “sensation of pricks and needles”, “pain in nerves” and “spots on the skin” responses were found in more than 30% of questionnaires in the NLG. Clinically, 88.2% had dysesthetic macular skin lesions and 97.1% presented some peripheral nerve impairment, 71.9% with some degree of disability. All cases were multibacillary, confirming a late diagnosis. Anti-PGL-I results in the LG were higher than in the NLG (p

Suggested Citation

  • Fred Bernardes Filho & Jaci Maria Santana & Regina Coeli Palma de Almeida & Glauber Voltan & Natália Aparecida de Paula & Marcel Nani Leite & Claudia Maria Lincoln Silva & Camila Tormena & Lean Basoli, 2020. "Leprosy in a prison population: A new active search strategy and a prospective clinical analysis," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0008917
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0008917
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0008917&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008917?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0008917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.